U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

South Korea ship sinking may be North's grandstanding

Related Topics

SEOUL | Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:25pm EDT

SEOUL (Reuters) - A South Korean naval ship was sinking near the maritime border with the North on Friday after possibly being hit by a torpedo and several sailors were killed, South Korean media reported.

The Seoul government has called an emergency meeting of senior cabinet ministers.

Here are some implications of the incident and how a possible North Korean attack would impact regional security and sputtering talks to end Pyongyang's nuclear arms ambitions.

* The North will not escalate tensions to the state of war, which would be a suicidal move for leader Kim Jong-il because his ill-equipped army would be no match for the advanced militaries of South Korea and its biggest ally the United States.

* If the North did attack the South's ship, the likely reason would have been to raise tension ahead of its return to the nuclear talks. The North often rattles sabers ahead of major diplomatic meetings to alarm its dialogue partners in the hope that they would be more willing to make concessions in return for Pyongyang reducing its military threat to the region.

* Military grandstanding by the North usually only has a temporary impact on markets, with investors saying it would take the threat of war to cause real and lasting impact.

* North Korea risks further hits to its economy by an attack on the South. Its nearly bare coffers have been further depleted by U.N. sanctions imposed after a nuclear test in May while a botched currency revaluation at the end of last year added to its woes and sparked rare civil unrest.

* A North Korean attack on the South strengthens Kim's standing at home among the country's powerful military. This could help him reshuffle cadres or perhaps clear the way for his youngest son to be named heir of the communist dynasty when the North's parliament holds its annual meeting on April 9.

* The North may follow the attack with other sorts of military grandstanding that could include missile launches or even another nuclear test.

* If Pyongyang goes too far, it could be hit by U.S. Treasury measures that would virtually cut off its meager international finances. This would deal a major blow to Kim who needs hard cash to win the support of cadres for his succession plans and to pay for an ambitious program lauded in his state's media to build a "strong and prosperous" nation by 2012.

(Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
fstwrtr wrote:
yeah, and while the US treasury
Implements measures against NK through
China, It’s only financial partner. China holds a giant US treasury
sell off. I doubt the US is going to
do much to NK in that respect.

Mar 26, 2010 1:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Gotthardbahn wrote:
What a weirdo country. This whole attack was likely done with Chinese connivance, as it suits their purposes to have a rabid dog at their side.
***
fstwrtr: China sold something like $35 bln Treasuries to bring down their total to something like $760 bln. A move but hardly ‘giant’. Given that US bond yields haven’t spiked in any meaningful sense, I’d say it was a non-event.

Mar 26, 2010 2:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
avgprsn wrote:
Let’s hope Iran is not taking too many lessons huh?

Mar 27, 2010 1:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.