FACTBOX-US health overhaul to hit corporate profits

March 26 | Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:07pm EDT

March 26 (Reuters) - The U.S. healthcare overhaul, signed into law this week by President Barack Obama, will cost U.S. companies millions this year.

Companies such as Deere & Co (DE.N) and Caterpillar Inc (CAT.N), which have large ranks of retirees, can no longer deduct from their taxes the subsidies paid by the federal government for retiree drug benefits. [ID:nN25229640]

Large U.S. employers, especially in the industrial sector, have started detailing the expected hit to their bottom line as a result of changes to the $2.5 trillion U.S. healthcare system. The tally so far:

* In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Caterpillar described the move as a tax hike. Accounting standards require the world's largest maker of earth-moving equipment to book a $100 million after-tax charge to reflect the change during the current fiscal quarter.

* Deere, a maker of farm equipment, said it expects to record a $150 million charge, mostly in its current fiscal second quarter. The expense was not included in the company's earlier 2010 forecast, which called for net income of about $1.3 billion.

* Diversified U.S. manufacturer Honeywell International Inc (HON.N) in January estimated that healthcare reform would trim its first-quarter earnings by 4 to 5 cents per share. A Honeywell spokesman said on Thursday that the company had not updated the earlier cost estimate and would continue to review the legislation.

* AK Steel Holding Corp (AKS.N) will record a noncash charge of approximately $31 million in the first quarter, due to a reduction in the value of the company's deferred tax asset as a result of a change to the tax treatment of Medicare Part D reimbursements.

* Valero Energy Corp (VLO.N) said it expects to take a charge to earnings of between $15 million and $20 million in the first quarter due to the new health care legislation.

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
inverse137 wrote:
Valero Energy expects to pay between $15MM – $20MM? Against $68BB in revenue???

Oooo..the poor babies. How will they ever survive? Here come the layoffs!!!

Doesn’t Willy Greehey earn close to $45MM annually?

This is a stupid article.

Mar 26, 2010 1:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
inverse137 wrote:
The more I think about this the angrier I get. Valero is saying that their expected “hit” from health care refore]m is LESS THAN half of their CEO’s annual compensation?

You have got to be kidding me!!

Mar 26, 2010 1:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
grasspress wrote:
i was just going to say that valero should be able to easily cover this new-found expense by some prudent trimming of executive pay schedules.

and why didn’t the most remarkable republican opposition to the health care legislation pick up on this in time to use it in their diatribes against the legislation?

as usual, they must have been asleep at the wheel.

Mar 26, 2010 1:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.