Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Most Americans: "Tax the rich but not me"

Related Topics

Anita Dwyer participates in a rally and march in protest of higher taxes in Santa Barbara, California, in this April 4, 2009 file photo. REUTERS/Phil McCarten/Files

Anita Dwyer participates in a rally and march in protest of higher taxes in Santa Barbara, California, in this April 4, 2009 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Phil McCarten/Files

WASHINGTON | Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:08pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Most Americans believe tax hikes are OK if you're making more than $250,000, a policy proposed by President Barack Obama, but hands off Medicare and Social Security, a poll released on Monday found.

The Quinnipiac University poll found that 60 percent of Americans among both major political parties think raising income taxes on households making more than $250,000 should be a main tenet of the government's efforts to tame the deficit. More than 70 percent, including a majority of Republicans, say those making more than $1 million should pay more.

But 80 percent say raising taxes on those making less than that should not be part of the government's approach. Moreover, most oppose touching Medicare and Social Security - two long-term drivers of the budget deficit over the coming decades.

"Given those numbers, it's clear that those who want serious deficit reduction have their work cut out for them in convincing the public, which seems adamantly opposed to cutting the programs with the largest budgets," said Peter Brown, assistant director of the polling institute.

In tackling the deficit, most economists agree taxing the rich only won't raise the revenue necessary to make a dent. With much of federal spending fixed in entitlement programs and interest of the debt, cutting spending alone is not likely to solve the nation's fiscal problems.

Broader tax increases in some form, whether it be income, sales or other forms, will be necessary, economists say.

This year, the deficit is expected to top $1.5 trillion, about 10 percent of gross domestic product. The administration and many economists say a healthy deficit would be about 3 percent of GDP.

Obama's 2011 budget proposal and most of his fellow Democrats favor eliminating tax breaks for individuals making more than $200,000 and for households making more than $250,000, which were enacted in 2001 and 2003.

Not surprisingly, many more Democrats than Republicans back hiking taxes on those making more, though 56 percent of Republicans did support raising taxes on those making more than $1 million, the poll found.

There was only a slim partisan divide, with only slightly fewer Republicans opposed to cutting the growth of the government health plan for the elderly, Medicare or Social Security, to help the deficit.

Congress is virtually certain to take action on tax laws this year because the cuts will expire for all income categories at the end of this year. Obama pledged during the presidential campaign not to raise takes on those making less than $250,000.

Under Obama's plan, the top two tax brackets will revert to 39.6 percent and 36 percent, from 35 percent and 33 percent now.

The poll conducted earlier this month surveyed 1,907 registered voters across the country, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points.

(Editing by Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (76)
policywhiz wrote:
It would be better to save SS and Medicare rather than pay for a costly universal government health care. Taking from the elderly who have worked most of their lives and contributed to society is not a worthy approach. Actually, taxing everybody is far more fair than taxing what our government calls rich.

Mar 29, 2010 1:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
djaymick wrote:
Another promise that Obama will not keep. Like you reported, most economist agree that increases on the wealthy only will not raise enough revenue. That is why many of the middle class (who make up the Tea Party movement) are against healthcare reform and other entitlement programs that this Administration wants to nationalize.

Mar 29, 2010 1:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
cosmickid2006 wrote:
I have news for the average taxpayer. Section 9002 of the healthcare bill requires your employer to add the cost of your medical insurance premiums to the gross income reported on your W2. In plain english what this is is a huge tax increase.

For example if your employers pays $5,000 per year for your medical insurance you will see a $5,000 increase in your gross income. If your income is subject to 25% taxes which is about average you will pay an extra $1,250 per year in federal income taxes.

How do you feel about a tax increase of this magnitude? How do you feel about the fact that this was not disclosed to you? Are you going to vote for the people who caused this to happen? Do you think change is in order?

Mar 29, 2010 1:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.