NASA to help on Toyota probe

Related Topics

A Toyota Motor Corp car is seen inside the environment testing chamber during a quality control demonstration at its headquarters in Toyota, central Japan, March 30, 2010. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon

A Toyota Motor Corp car is seen inside the environment testing chamber during a quality control demonstration at its headquarters in Toyota, central Japan, March 30, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Kim Kyung-Hoon

WASHINGTON | Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:06am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. auto safety regulators are turning to scientists from the NASA space and aeronautics agency for help analyzing Toyota electronic throttles to see if they are behind unintended acceleration, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said.

Separate from the work of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration scientists, LaHood said, experts from the National Academy of Sciences will lead a study of unintended acceleration across the auto industry, a broader issue raised by congressional lawmakers at recent hearings on Toyota Motor Corp.

"We are determined to get to the bottom of unintended acceleration," LaHood said in an interview with Reuters ahead of the formal announcement on Tuesday.

The Transportation Department's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is just beginning its review of Toyota electronic throttles, which have come under heightened scrutiny following the recall of 8.5 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles over the past six months for unintended acceleration.

While the government and Toyota blame mechanical or equipment flaws for the problem, questions have been raised about whether NHTSA over the years adequately handled investigations into motorist and other complaints of possible electronic throttle problems.

The NHTSA review is to be completed by late summer, after which the highway traffic safety agency would then determine whether a formal investigation of Toyota throttles is warranted. Such a probe would set in motion a process that could lead to a recall.

LaHood said the timetable would not likely change unless "something very dramatic" happened with the NASA work.

Other investigations dating to 2004 found no throttle defect, but the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration handled those cases internally.

Toyota, too, has asked an outside engineering consultant, Exponent, to review its throttles, and its preliminary findings have discovered no problems, underscoring Toyota's steadfast conclusion that its throttle systems are sound.

The Transportation Department inspector general is investigating NHTSA's and Toyota's handling of investigations into unintended acceleration. LaHood said the department watchdog would also determine whether NHTSA has appropriate staffing and expertise to handle sophisticated investigations.

Nine NASA scientists would bring expertise in electronics, eletromagnetic interference, software integrity and complex problem solving to the Toyota review, Transportation Department officials said.

LaHood has maintained that NHTSA could handle the analysis itself, but said suggestions from lawmakers at congressional hearings prompted him to consider outside help.

"We've used them before. We've heard that they may have some influence," LaHood said of his decision to ask NASA to help.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has teamed with NASA in the past on studies of electronic stability control and airbags.

As part of the Toyota review, NHTSA has purchased the Lexus ES 350 once owned by a Tennessee woman whose testimony before Congress personalized allegations of unintended acceleration.

Rhonda Smith said the luxury sedan suddenly accelerated out of control for six miles while she was headed to Knoxville in October 2006.

An NHTSA investigator could not find any problems and the subsequent owner drove the vehicle for 27,000 miles without any acceleration problems, transportation officials said.

Smith's vehicle was among the models included in a 2007 Toyota recall of 55,000 floor mats that was carried out several months after the alleged mishap.

Regulators and the company warned that loose mats could be jammed by the accelerator. A second, much larger recall related to floor mats was conducted in October 2009.

The broader industry review of unintended acceleration by the National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council is expected to take about 18 months.

The National Academy of Sciences, which receives most of its funding from the government, taps expertise from the scientific community and its studies and recommendations are peer reviewed.

NHTSA is also investigating whether Toyota met requirements for providing regulators with recall-related information in a timely way. There is no timeframe for completion of that investigation.

(Reporting by John Crawley; Editing by Gary Hill)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
Darr247 wrote:
It’s dumb to test just the circuitry theoretically… get a sampling of the cars’ wiring harnesses from the factory assembly area and put them through the same range-of-motion action they would have seen in actual use so they can find the wires on the clutch-interlocks that break, or the insulation that rubs off and shorts wires together so the brake-throttle override switch can’t open the circuit, vice-versa, et cetera, ad nauseam.

Mar 30, 2010 7:02am EDT  --  Report as abuse
TomMariner wrote:
With its $800 million budget, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration doesn’t have the expertise to handle the “complex electronics” used in cars? Cars are a unique combination of electronic interference, rotten corrosion problems and bad vibration, yet most of the thinking for the vehicle is done by computers. Normal auto electronic designers live with these facts every day and subject their designs for example to salt spray for weeks while being power cycled.

There are smart people at NASA, but those who have built a fleet of 6 vehicles over 35 years may not be the best to comment on tens of millions of units per year driven by those with less than a pilots licence. Granted the Shuttles have a much higher top speed, but similar 0-60 times, but if I ran NHTSA I would be ashamed that I didn’t have the best car lab on the planet.

Mar 30, 2010 7:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Icarus wrote:
This may not be a bad move. The conventional wisdom is that broken things stay broken. That is not always the case. NASA has experience a phenomena called tin whiskers which can create temporary electrical paths and then burn away. It is far more common in the pure tin plating used in cars to eliminate lead. It’s the reason that the aerospace has stayed with lead solder…Don’t know if that is the problem, but it fits. Low occurrance and vanishes without a trace.

Also, agree with Tom above…NHTSA should embarrased about their lack of knowledge in electronics.

Mar 30, 2010 8:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.