U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Army chief sees defacto moratorium on gay discharges

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:07pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Army secretary said on Wednesday he would not discharge gay personnel who admitted their sexual orientation to him, despite the "don't ask, don't tell" stance that remains official military policy.

"What the secretary (of defense) has placed a moratorium on is going forward on discharges," Army Secretary John McHugh told defense reporters.

The statement seemed to indicate that some Pentagon leaders had already shifted their stance, at least regarding private admissions by gay troops, although Congress has not yet formally repealed the law banning declared homosexuals.

President Barack Obama has stated his determination to scrap the "don't ask, don't tell" policy initiated in 1993, which allows gays to serve in the military as long as they kept their sexual identity secret. The Defense Department is currently surveying troops about the possible impact of a repeal and aims to conclude its study by December.

The Pentagon last week issued new rules making it harder for the armed forces to discharge gay personnel, but admissions of homosexuality were still thought to be grounds for discharge under the existing law.

McHugh, a former Republican lawmaker nominated by Obama, suggested Defense Secretary Robert Gates backed turning a blind eye to such admissions during talks with troops about their feelings on ending the ban.

"It is not so stated but I think a reasonable assumption" that he need not pursue discharges, McHugh said.

He said he had already had heard admissions from active-duty personnel, but had taken no action. He assumed other military leaders were having similar experiences.

"What I'm trying to do is tell the troops that's it's OK to talk about this, no matter what their view is," said McHugh, the Army's top civilian official. He used the word "moratorium" loosely to describe the defacto Pentagon policy.

HOT-BUTTON ISSUE

Obama called for the repeal in his State of the Union speech in January, putting a spotlight on the hot-button issue before congressional elections in November.

While the top U.S. military officer, Admiral Mike Mullen, has supported repeal, several prominent offices and lawmakers have questioned lifting the ban at a time when the U.S. military is stretched by wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Gates, Mullen and other Pentagon chiefs have also roundly opposed congressional calls for a broader moratorium on the 'don't ask, don't tell' law.

But even the more limited moratorium that McHugh described would be a victory for gay personnel who have feared that discussing their sexuality during the Pentagon review might end their military careers.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said that "don't ask, don't tell' remained in force, but acknowledged that being able to have open conversations with service members, including those who are gay, was necessary to the review process.

McHugh said he felt disciplining service members who admitted their sexuality would undermine the review effort.

"It would be counter-productive in trying to pursue the secretary and ultimately the president's policy objective ... to take disciplinary action against someone who has spoken openly and honestly," he said.

(Editing by Alan Elsner)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
pie-kun wrote:
How exactly is this a “hot button” issue when the overwhelming majority of people support repealing the law?

Mar 31, 2010 2:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
FrankLee wrote:
It seems as if this country is actually headed towards civilization, despite the loud kicking and screaming by the non-silent non-majority. Amazing.

Mar 31, 2010 3:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
klgrube wrote:
I’m sorry, but the majority of people – and more importantly the majority of military families – absolutely DO NOT want this rule overturned. But then I guess Secretary Gates just REALLY wants to be the first person invited to the party when gay couples are allowed to live in military family housing – while they watch the moving vans pulling away from every other family leaving the military. What a total idiot! If this happens because of repealing DADT, you can count on I would guess about a 90% reduction in our fighting forces! How domb can this guy possibly be?

Mar 31, 2010 4:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.