Electric cars get initial '0'-emission rating

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Apr 1, 2010 12:38pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Electric cars will initially

be given a "zero" emissions rating in new U.S. auto fuel efficiency regulations as an incentive for industry to mass produce them, the U.S. government said on Thursday.

"Right now, it's pretty clear that the credit is needed for these vehicles," a senior government official said on Thursday.

Automakers have been concerned that plug-in electric cars -- which several manufacturers have in the pipeline or on the drawing board -- would be penalized in regulatory formulas used to calculate each company's efforts to meet a new fleet-wide efficiency target of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016.

Under an incentive program unveiled by the Transportation Department and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the first 200,000 vehicles produced by each manufacturer will be given a zero emissions rating.

After that, the rating of the vehicle will reflect the upstream greenhouse gas emissions associated with charging the vehicles.

The more carbon emissions an automaker produces through its fleet of cars and trucks, the harder it will be to reach the government-set goal, which is a 42 percent gain over current regulations.

Currently, the market for gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles, the most efficient on the road, is narrow, and the market for electric cars is not known.

Electric vehicles are now a product of niche manufacturers, but government tax credits, other incentives and consumer interest are boosting manufacturing plans.

General Motors Co intends to roll out its Volt plug-in electric car later this year. Nissan Motor Co Ltd is also producing a battery-powered car, the Leaf.

Industry costs of meeting the new fuel regulation escalate annually from $5.9 billion in 2012, the first year of the new rule, to $14.9 billion in 2016, according to Transportation Department statistics.

(Reporting by John Crawley, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
sailor409 wrote:
Not only is this the worst kind of green deception, it will warp the market by its false premise. Not only should the emissions from the generation of the electricity used be allocated to these cars, but also the energy used to generate the electricity should be used against the mileage claims, and the pollution created to make and dispose of the batteries added to the costs. We have already learned the truth of biofuel, that it reduces food farming, is more costly than petroleum fuels, doesn’t reduce net emissions, and increases the cost of meat and milk.

Apr 01, 2010 3:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
LanceSmith wrote:
Sounds like a good plan to me. At 200K cars, the concerns of saillor409 pretty much fall by the wayside (who will care in a year or two what the 200K cars mean or don’t mean to emissions – let’s think bigger). In terms of a comparison with petroleum fuels vs. biofuels and cost, you are missing a really BIG cost of oil: our defense budget and the people who die protecting our oil interests. Biofuels are one of the several future fuels. While some folks would love to snap their fingers and have every problem and issue fixed, those of us in the real world understand that these things take time and there will be bugs. That doesn’t mean we should not use biofuels…that just means that those of us who look for opportunities should jump on them!

Apr 01, 2010 4:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
billebob wrote:
Can’t wait for electric cars and personal solar recharging units. Until then I will proudly drive around in my E 85 powered vehicle. it feels good keeping my fuel dollars at home and out of the hands of terrorist. Bio fuel critics never include the cost and carbon used in moving huge supertankers from one side of planet to another.

Apr 01, 2010 4:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.