A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

John Malkovich seeks $2.23 million from Madoff trustee

Photo

Billboard Music Awards

All the highlights from the show.  Slideshow 

Actor John Malkovich (L) and Bernard Madoff are shown in this April 1, 2010 combination file photograph. REUTERS/Files

Actor John Malkovich (L) and Bernard Madoff are shown in this April 1, 2010 combination file photograph.

Credit: Reuters/Files

NEW YORK | Thu Apr 1, 2010 5:29pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Actor John Malkovich, a former client of Bernard Madoff, is seeking to recover $2.23 million from the liquidation of the securities firm once run by the imprisoned Ponzi schemer.

In a Thursday filing in Manhattan bankruptcy court, the John Malkovich Pension Plan and Trust objected to a decision by Irving Picard, the trustee liquidating Madoff's firm, to award it $670,000.

Like many other Madoff investors, the Malkovich trust argued that it deserves the balance reflected on its November 30, 2008 account statement from Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, the final statement prior to Madoff's arrest 11 days later.

On March 1, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland, who is overseeing the Madoff firm's liquidation, endorsed Picard's "net equity" method to calculate losses, marking the differences between what investors put into and took out of the firm.

Victims who believe the final balances reflect what they should recover, even if the sums are fictitious, are appealing to a federal appeals court in New York. The Malkovich trust said it expected that court to overturn Lifland's ruling.

"A customer generally expects to receive what he believes is in his account at the time the stockbroker ceases business," the trust argued.

"While there may be a basis to disallow customer claims for wholly fictitious securities of nonexisting entities, here the securities set forth on (the) Malkovich Trust's final BMIS statement and prior statements were those of actual companies listed on the stock exchange," the trust argued.

Among other victims of Madoff's estimated $65 billion Ponzi scheme are actor Kevin Bacon, Hall of Fame baseball pitcher Sandy Koufax, World Trade Center site developer Larry Silverstein, Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel and New York Mets owner Fred Wilpon.

Bernard Madoff is serving a 150-year prison sentence.

The case is Securities Investor Protection Corp v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, No. 08-1789.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Bdy2010 wrote:
stand in line, just because you made your living entertaining people doesn’t mean you get head of the line privileges on this one.

Apr 01, 2010 6:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Story_Burn wrote:
Bdy2010, just what I was thinking

Apr 01, 2010 6:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Jos5319 wrote:
Washington is not doing enough to go after many other Madoffs who are out loose, and catch them BEFORE they have squandered off their loot. How come the likes of Larry Summers, Geithner don’t respond like they’re ultimately responsible. They ARE responsible.

This one crook got caught ONLY BECAUSE his sons thought their communication to their lawyer was going to be confidential. In fact, it was not– not any more since rules enacted in the aftermath of Enron.

Geithner, Larry: you guys are failing America. Madoff had been reported many times when he still had the loot, but the government failed to figure out how he was cheating. And they still can’t, for the many other Madoff’s out there.

Apr 01, 2010 7:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.