Fitch Rates Rhode Island's $69.8MM Refunding GOs 'AA'; Outlook Negative
* Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.
NEW YORK--(Business Wire)-- Fitch Ratings assigns an 'AA' rating to the following State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations' general obligation (GO) bonds: --$69.8 million consolidated capital development loan of 2010, refunding series A. In addition, Fitch affirms the following ratings: --$1.1 billion in outstanding GO bonds at 'AA'; --$232.8 million in outstanding appropriation-backed debt at 'AA-'. The Rating Outlook is Negative. The bonds are expected to sell via negotiation on or about April 7, 2010. On April 5, 2010, Fitch Ratings recalibrated its U.S. public finance credit ratings for states as well as the District of Columbia, New York City, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; the above ratings reflect this recalibration. Fitch announced the recalibration in the 'Recalibration of U.S. Public Finance Ratings' special report, which was published on March 25, 2010 and is available at 'fitchratings.com' under the following headers: Sectors >> Public Finance >> U.S. Public Finance >> Research. For more detail on the rating adjustments, please see the March 25, 2010 report. Fitch will revise the remaining tax-supported ratings along with water and sewer, public power distribution-only, and public higher education ratings April 30, 2010, as detailed in the March 25, 2010 report. RATING RATIONALE: --Rhode Island's economic performance has been among the worst of the states in the downturn, with severe jobs losses, very high unemployment, and weak personal income trends. The most recent data suggests that the state's recovery, which is expected to be sluggish, has not yet begun. The state's real estate market continues to suffer. --Although longstanding financial controls remain in place, the state's finances have been and continue to be strained, requiring significant one-time measures to resolve budget gaps. --Debt ratios are above average, although still in the moderate range. Pension funding levels are low. WHAT COULD TRIGGER A DOWNGRADE? --The state's inability to implement sustainable budget solutions and address other long-term liabilities in the context of persistent revenue declines due to continued weakness in the state's economy. --Continued deterioration in the state's economy and real estate market, that further pressures financial flexibility. SECURITY: Bonds are general obligations of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, secured by a pledge of the state's full faith and credit. CREDIT SUMMARY: The Negative Rating Outlook, assigned in March 2009, continues to reflect Rhode Island's weak economy and severely strained financial position. After more than two years of severe job losses, Rhode Island's unemployment rate of 12.7% (February 2010) is the third highest of the states and well above the national average of 9.7%. Weak conditions in the economy and real estate market continue to pressure state revenues and challenge fiscal health and stability. After enacting a balanced fiscal 2010 budget and ending fiscal 2009 with a deficit of approximately $62 million, continued revenue declines as well as increased social service demands created a current year gap of $219 million. The fiscal 2011 budget gap is estimated at $427 million. While the governor has proposed plans to address both the fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011 budget gaps, the state legislature has not yet acted on either proposal. Preliminary details on the legislature's 2010 supplemental budget are expected to be released as early as Wednesday, April 7. Rhode Island's economic performance throughout the recession has been amongst the weakest of the states. After adding jobs every year from 1992 through 2006, the state fell into the recession early, with year-over-year job losses beginning in August 2007. Although the pace of job loss has slowed somewhat in recent months, the February 2010 unemployment rate was high, at 12.7%, equal to 131% of the U.S. rate. The state's personal income indicators, although weak, have shown relative stability in the downturn, with the state's year-over-year quarterly declines not as severe as those of New England and the U.S. Per capita personal income is slightly above average; 2009 personal income equaled 104.8% of the U.S. The state's precarious economic environment is also exacerbated by real estate market conditions. After years of strong real estate market development and appreciation, Rhode Island has been seeing a steep market correction, with additional pressures from delinquencies, foreclosures, and subprime mortgages. The road to recovery in Rhode Island is projected to be long and slow, with some forecasts projecting continued declines in residential real estate for the next five years and other forecasts reporting that peak employment will not return until 2016. Similar to Rhode Island's recent economic trends, the state's finances felt the effects of the recession early, with revenue declines beginning as early as November 2007. The state has used numerous measures to close budget gaps in recent years, including but not limited to steep cuts to state government spending and personnel, drastic cuts to local aid, utilization of federal stimulus money and other one-time solutions, implementation of pension reform, and increases to some fees and taxes. Fiscal 2008 closed with a deficit of approximately $43 million, even after deficit financing in the form of tobacco settlement bonds, and rather than utilize reserve funds, state officials opted to carry the shortfall into the fiscal 2009 budget. After enacting a balanced fiscal 2009 budget, declining revenues and increased expenditures resulted in a mid-year budget gap of roughly $360 million, which was subsequently closed with a combination of revenue measures, spending cuts, one-time solutions, and federal stimulus funds. Following downward revisions in the May 2009 consensus economic forecast, a $70 million budget gap was projected for fiscal 2009. After $22 million was appropriated from the state's reserve fund, the remainder was carried forward into the fiscal 2010 budget. At the close of fiscal 2009, the state's reserve carried a balance of $80 million, equal to 2.7% of revenues. The enacted budget for fiscal 2010 totaled about $3.1 billion and resolved a budget gap of $553 million (roughly 18% of revenues) with a combination of federal stimulus funds, cuts to local aid, pension reform, and some undistributed savings and one-time measures. In the state's most recent economic forecast (November 2009), however, revenues were revised downward by $130 million for fiscal 2010; combined with increased spending for social services and the fiscal 2009 deficit, the current year budget gap stands at approximately $219 million, equal to 7.4% of estimated fiscal 2010 revenues. In December 2009, the governor presented a supplemental budget addressing the $219 million shortfall for fiscal 2010 with cuts to local aid, additional pension reform, further reductions to state agencies, and one-time budget solutions (including land sales and delay of reserve fund replenishment). Subsequently, in January 2010, the governor presented a budget for fiscal 2011 totaling $2.9 billion and addressing a projected gap of $427 million. The governor's budget recommendations for addressing the substantial fiscal 2011 gap include $163 million in local aid cuts, $95 million in stimulus funds from two additional quarters of enhanced FMAP, $32 million in other one-time solutions, and other cuts in state spending. The state legislature is currently discussing the supplemental budget proposal for fiscal 2010 as well as the budget for fiscal 2011, which begins on July 1. Although the next formal review forecast will not be published until May 2010, the state reports that revenues through February 2010 are roughly in line with the November 2009 forecast, a reversal of recent trends. Fitch will continue to monitor the state's financial position and overall economy in light of recent and projected revenue declines. The state's ability to implement sustainable long-term budget solutions will be a key rating driver, and Fitch expects that the ability to achieve structural balance will become increasingly challenging as federal stimulus money is removed from the operating budget in fiscal 2012. Rhode Island's debt ratios are on the high end of the moderate range, after increasing in fiscal 2009 with debt for transportation programs and bonding for the state's historic structures tax credit liability to provide budget relief. Net tax-supported debt of approximately $2.2 billion at June 30, 2009 equaled about 5.1% of personal income, an increase from 4.6% at June 30, 2008. Pension funding, at 60.9% as of June 30, 2008, is low and the unfunded liability, equals roughly 10% of personal income (2009). While the state has been successful in enacting some pension reform in recent years, the ability to address the low funding will be a significant long-term credit factor. Applicable criteria available on Fitch's website at www.fitchratings.com includes: --'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Dec. 21, 2009. --'U.S. State Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Dec. 28, 2009. Additional information is available at www.fitchratings.com. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE. Fitch Ratings Alexandra K. Edwards, +1-212-908-9181 Laura Porter, +1-212-908-0575 (New York) Media Relations: Cindy Stoller, +1-212-908-0526 (New York) cindy.stoller@fitchratings.com Copyright Business Wire 2010
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.



Follow Reuters