Public supports energy over environment: poll

Related Topics

Oil rigs are seen in Midland, Texas May 9, 2008. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

Oil rigs are seen in Midland, Texas May 9, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Jessica Rinaldi

WASHINGTON | Tue Apr 6, 2010 11:20am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - For the first time in 10 years Americans are more likely to say the United States should give more priority to developing oil, natural gas and coal than to protecting the environment, according to a poll on Tuesday.

The poll was conducted a few weeks before President Barack Obama announced he would open offshore oil drilling in some parts the U.S. East Coast, Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.

Half of 1,014 U.S. adults, who were surveyed March 4-7 by Gallup, said the country should give more priority to developing and producing the fossil fuels. Only 43 percent said protection of the environment should be given priority, even at the risk of limiting the amount of energy supplies.

It was the first time in the 10 years that Gallup has been asking the question that energy production was favored over environment.

The poll was released a few weeks before Senators John Kerry, a Democrat, Lindsey Graham, a Republican and Joe Lieberman, an independent, hope to unveil a compromise climate bill that would effectively put fees on fuels such as gasoline and coal to reduce emissions of gases blamed for warming the planet. The bill would also seek to increase incentives for offshore drilling and nuclear power.

According to the poll, 52 percent of Americans favored greater energy conservation while only 36 percent favored greater production of oil, natural gas, and coal as a means of solving the country's energy problems.

Oil prices have risen about $6 since early March to about $87 per barrel, an 18-month high, on strong economic data in the United States, the world's top petroleum consumer.

The Gallup data have a 4 percentage point margin of error.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
breezinthru wrote:
it’s really not an either/or proposition. Fossil fuels will eventually deplete and the environment will no longer be so adversely effected.

Apr 06, 2010 10:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
pcisbs wrote:
Finally people are seeing through the abject, despicable and felonious lies spewed by the Climate Hoax Con-men! Sit down, lying dirt-bag Al Gore! There is no such thing as “Man Made global warming”; earn a living honestly; instead of siphoning money from the wallets of hard working Americans,

Apr 07, 2010 1:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JDinOR wrote:
The Public Does Not Support Energy over Environment. 507 people out of a random sampling of 1014 individuals either informed or uninformed responded to whatever question(s) was asked.

This is the modern dilemma of todays news media when the basis and integrity of the information provided is subjected to ratings over objective balance of reporting issues of concern to us all.

Bring back the Editor to whom money is not the decisive factor in reporting.

Disgrace and disgust have been going on for so long it has become the norm. I’m deeply saddened by our progress in an inevitable demise whereupon we can only blame ourselves.

Apr 07, 2010 11:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.