Factbox: Key elements of Obama's new nuclear strategy

Tue Apr 6, 2010 2:14pm EDT

(Reuters) - The Obama administration, kicking off an intensive week of nuclear diplomacy, unveiled a revamped policy on Tuesday restricting U.S. use of its atomic weapons stockpile.

A Nuclear Posture Report is required by Congress of every U.S. leader but President Barack Obama had set high expectations when he vowed last year to end "Cold War thinking" and setting out a vision for a world free of nuclear weapons.

Following are key elements of the review:

* The United States for the first time is forswearing use of atomic weapons against non-nuclear countries, a break with a Bush-era threat of nuclear retaliation in the event of a biological or chemical attack.

But the policy shift came with the caveat that countries will be spared a U.S. nuclear response only if they are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That loophole means nuclear-defiant Iran and North Korea would not be protected.

* "The United States will not develop new nuclear warheads," the document stated. This appeared to rule out going ahead with Bush-era pursuit of low-yield "bunker buster" nuclear bombs to be able penetrate buried targets such as Iranian nuclear facilities.

* The strategy review called for increased investment in upgrading U.S. weapons infrastructure, saying this "will not only guarantee our stockpile, but facilitate further nuclear reductions." Arms control experts see potential for significant cuts in the U.S. stockpile by upgrading weapons laboratories to weed out older, ineffective warheads.

* The administration pledged to pursue further arms control with Russia beyond the new START pact, which Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev will sign in Prague on Thursday and which will cut nuclear arsenals by a third. It said any new efforts would address not only strategic weapons but also non-strategic and non-deployed nuclear weapons. The administration also pledged to pursue high-level dialogue with Moscow and Beijing to promote stability and transparency.

* The review stopped short of declaring deterrence from nuclear attack to be the only purpose of the U.S. nuclear arsenal and did not renounce a first-strike option -- as arms control advocates had hoped. But it did set a longer-term objective of making deterrence the "sole" purpose of America's atomic weapons.

* The document declared that the United States would keep up efforts to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in national security strategy while strengthening conventional arms capabilities.

* The Obama administration pledged not to conduct any further nuclear testing and to seek long-delayed ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. The treaty was rejected by the U.S. Senate in the 1990s and still faces big hurdles with lawmakers who believe it can be exploited by Iran and North Korea.

(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick in Washington; Editing by David Storey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Wesee wrote:
All this info is just a front, to hide and distract the consciousness into believing that Obama and those behind the scenes controlling him actually care for Humanity,…what a Joke!, there are far to many other things to be discussing,…coming right up!…More of the Obama Joke!!! YA!!!

Apr 06, 2010 2:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jeustor wrote:
yeah thats great….no mo nukes…whoopi..until they decide they need them again and then bang, back to the “cold-war-iron-curtain point them at each other until someone pulls the trigger” REAL-ity that is this existence…

so back to the JOBS….that we lack and that we need to “earn a living” or die…uhmm..

So I was told a few weeks ago that the entire group of developers and administrators I work with will be let go by 6/24/2010. So my 18 month contract with this large Insurance company (BCBS) located in Newark NJ will be cut short by about a year. They claim it was a decision made by upper management to outsource all of our work and they blame it on the economy. This will leave me without a job in very tough time again, when work is scarce and life…miserable….

While the outsourcing will be provided by IBM, it will be done off-shore. Which means my job is going over-seas…and then they wonder why the “economy” is doing so bad…if we don’t have jobs or money to buy your products, we won’t….and even though you take my job over-seas and pay them my salary…guess what, they won’t buy your products either…because they are over-seas….so any cost savings will be eliminated by the fact that we are without jobs and cannot afford your products.

And the irony of all this is that its business as usual for this supposedly non-profit corporation which had to cutoutsource it’s resources and to cut cost so that upper management can continue non-profiting …ya..sure..

So back to the grind of trying to find another job so I can “Earn a Living”…instead of dying….trying…..in this miserable economy…in this miserable world where Money is so much more important then Human Life….
————–
If there was no money, and we did not charge each other to live, we would have already found the cure to every disease that plagues our society. Why? Because there would be no lack of funding to find the cure. If we didn’t waste so much time on money; earning it, protecting it, spending it, paying bills, etc., we would have the time to dedicate to the more important problems in life….finding the cures we need.

Do you want to know what the solution is to every problem that humanity faces? Eliminate Money and need to charge each other to live. Make human rights the number one priority and make this existence a free one. Let us each work 2 hours a day to make one good product we can all share and make it free to live. Eliminate the need to profit and compete with each other. Eliminate the need to waste my existence making , spending, chasing after and protecting money so I can live. There would be no reason for wars, murders, crime, etc. There would be no crime because there would be no need for it because everything would be free. Just like the heaven we are expecting at death, except we get to enjoy it now instead of when we are DEAD.

www.myspace.com/jaychijken

Apr 06, 2010 2:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bunkerbuster wrote:
When will you dipsticks realize that these weapons are the only deterence for a dirty bomb going off in a US city. The threat of Mecca going up in a fireball is the only thing left stopping those who wish to harm us. Nice way of our brilliant muslim leaning president to say “come N Get us”.
Nice flower Power Obama. It will end up having us all pushing up daisies. :(

Apr 06, 2010 3:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.