U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Factbox: Reaction to new U.S. nuclear policy

Tue Apr 6, 2010 2:53pm EDT

(Reuters) - The Obama administration announced restrictions in U.S. use of nuclear arms on Tuesday, renouncing development of new atomic weapons and heralding cuts in America's stockpile.

It also announced plans to pursue high-level bilateral dialogues with Russia and China to promote "more stable and transparent strategic relationships," according to a Defense Department document.

The following is selected reaction to the move:

SPOKESWOMAN FOR UNITED NATIONS SECRETARY-GENERAL BAN

KI-MOON

"The Secretary-General welcomes President Obama's reaffirmation of his commitment toward a nuclear-free world. Following the recent successful conclusion of negotiations between the Russian Federation and the U.S. for a successor agreement to the Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (START), the release of this new Nuclear Posture Review is a timely initiative in that direction."

KEVIN MARTIN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PEACE ACTION, A U.S.

ANTI-NUCLEAR WEAPONS GROUP

"The president's Nuclear Posture Review, released today, appears to be too beholden to outdated Cold War thinking, and it doesn't measure up to his vision of a nuclear-free world. It's certainly better than the one released by the Bush administration, which called for the possibility of using nuclear weapons on non-nuclear states. The Obama administration reversed that.

"President Obama also stated the U.S. would not build new nuclear weapons like those the previous administration wanted but Congress thankfully blocked. Nonetheless, the document leaves room for the possibilities of new warheads in the future."

KIRK LEOPOLD, FORMER COMMANDER OF USS COLE AND SENIOR

FELLOW AT MILITARY FAMILIES UNITED

"The President's goal of a world free of nuclear weapons is a noble idea. Unfortunately, it remains unrealistic and naive in a world that has yet to embrace this notion.

"As long as nations like North Korea and Iran continue to flout international agreements and other nations like Russia and China continue to improve and enhance their nuclear arsenals, the United States must retain the full and flexible use of nuclear weapons as a vital component of U.S. deterrent strategy.

"In addition, the surety of our nuclear force must be modernized and maintained for the foreseeable future."

DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATIVE EDWARD MARKEY, FOUNDER OF HOUSE

BIPARTISAN TASKFORCE ON NONPROLIFERATION

"This marks a sea change in America's nuclear strategy. For too long, we have kept in place a stagnant Cold War era policy that failed to recognize the shifting geopolitical landscape.

"These long overdue changes in our nuclear policy will make us more secure by downgrading the role that nuclear weapons play in our defense and emphasizing that such weapons exist only to deter their actual use."

TOM DONNELLY, DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE STUDIES, AMERICAN

ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE

"The release of the Obama administration's Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) is part of a larger set of policies that look to the past rather than preparing the United States for the nuclear future. Arms-control advocates are as prone as any generals to refight the last war rather than prepare for the future. The quality of our nuclear forces -- their modernity, flexibility and strategic utility -- are now more important than the quantity.

"Bilateral arms treaties do little to protect us in the emerging, multipolar nuclear environment. The threat of nuclear terrorism, as worrisome as it is, is not the only proliferation concern."

SHARON SQUASSONI, DIRECTOR OF THE PROLIFERATION PREVENTION

PROGRAM, CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

"This NPR says we don't need nuclear weapons to deter a wide range of threats, we need them to deter a narrow range of threat. And the focus is on improving conventional flexibility to deter threats that we would have previously deterred with nuclear weapons.

"So, it probably doesn't go far enough to appease the most ardent nuclear disarmament advocates, but that's OK."

(Reporting by Andrew Quinn; Editing by Xavier Briand)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
deerecub1977 wrote:
so now if a country dirty bombs someone we will all be told to stand down?Its obvious where this will lead.passive is the wrong way for the united states of america.one world govt here we come

Apr 06, 2010 3:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Streetfighter wrote:
Thank you Mr. President for doing what a nation and decades of cowards couldn’t. Rid this world of fear already.

Apr 06, 2010 4:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.