U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

White House: "No decision" on new Mideast plan

Related Topics

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE | Fri Apr 9, 2010 1:12pm EDT

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (Reuters) - The White House promised on Friday not to "surprise anybody at any time" with a dramatic shift in Middle East peace strategy and said no decision had been made for President Barack Obama to offer his own solution to the conflict.

While dampening expectations for a revamped U.S. approach, national security adviser Jim Jones left open the possibility of further internal discussions, following reports that a broad new Israeli-Palestinian peace proposal was under consideration.

"These are ongoing discussions, and I think that while we've not taken any decision to jumpstart any dramatic shift in our strategy, I think we should say, to make clear, that we don't intend to surprise anybody at any time," Jones told reporters aboard Air Force One as Obama flew back from Prague.

Speculation that Obama was weighing his own plan was fueled this week by several news reports, which come amid strains with Israel over its Jewish settlement expansion policy and U.S. frustration over a continuing deadlock in peace efforts.

The news leaks were widely interpreted as a possible trial balloon by the White House to increase pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had tense talks with Obama last month at the White House.

Jones described U.S.-Israeli ties as "fine," despite Netanyahu's decision to withdraw from a nuclear security summit in Washington next week, fearing Muslim delegates would demand Israel give up its assumed nuclear arsenal.

Former national security advisers Brent Scowcroft, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Sandy Berger met with Jones in the White House last month after Netanyahu's visit and recommended that the U.S. advance stalled peace talks by proposing its own plan.

Obama dropped in and listened to the proposal but did not tip his hand, the Washington Post and New York Times reported.

Washington Post columnist David Ignatius wrote that Obama was "seriously considering" presenting a broad peace plan and cited one official saying it could be launched by this fall.

Jones confirmed that the Middle East was a topic on the agenda of a recent White House meeting with several of his predecessors but insisted: "There's been no decision on that."

He said the administration's focus was on getting Israel and the Palestinians to begin indirect, U.S. brokered talks.

Obama, who took office pledging to make Middle East peace a high priority, has gained little headway, acknowledging earlier this year that he underestimated the obstacles.

Asked whether a U.S. peace plan was under consideration, Jones said, "The idea of a U.S. plan has been talked about for years. It's not something new. But there will be no surprise to any of the participants at all."

(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Writing by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Jackie Frank)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Ismailtaimur wrote:
Its ridiculous to know that the worlds most powerful nation cannot influence its closest ally, its a shame in this age and era the palestinian innocents have to suffer for the western bigotry, first the british who created a nation called israel of biblical diabolism and also pakistan from India, in both the cases the muslim masses have suffered from religious hoopla and ruined by the zionist extremisim and narrow minded ruling elite, if the jews beleive in god they should stand for the right cause and also help the suffereres of oppression by the israeli army , i will quote from a Indian freedom fighter called Tilak , who stood against the british telling freedom was his birth right and the same stands for every Palestinian soul, President Obama should not have quoted earlier if some one sends rockets where is kids are playing he will have a right to target the whole of palestine, but he is forgetting that the lands have been snatched. If he is a genuine peace maker , he should command israel to stop barricading innocents and also break the wall.

Apr 09, 2010 3:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
saavedra wrote:
General Petraeus had something to say on the Israeli Palestinian conflict March 17, 2010:

Insufficient progress toward a comprehensive Middle East peace. The enduring hostilities between Israel and some of its neighbors present distinct challenges to our ability to advance our interests in the AOR. Israeli-Palestinian tensions often flare into violence and large-scale armed confrontations. The conflict foments anti-American sentiment, due to a perception of U.S. favoritism for Israel. Arab anger over the Palestinian question limits the strength and depth of U.S. partnerships with governments and peoples in the AOR and weakens the legitimacy of moderate regimes in the Arab world. Meanwhile, al-Qaeda and other militant groups exploit that anger to mobilize support. The conflict also gives Iran influence in the Arab world through its clients, Lebanese Hizballah and Hamas.Seems pretty unambiguous.

Apr 09, 2010 5:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dami wrote:
Peace in the Middle East

SOS’s Successful Failures will Continue!
For How Long? Luke 21:24
Depends, Romans 11:25 on the Last Gentile who Believes the Gospel Message.

To Muslims
Internet Moon god and Archaeology, don’t want to get caught in the Dark!

Apr 09, 2010 10:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.