Editor's Choice

Debate recap: Bird Flu Research

Two pathologists dissect a swan in the Danish Food Research Center in Aarhus, Jutland, February 16, 2006. Europe began locking up its one-billion-strong chicken flock on Wednesday after the deadly bird flu virus was found in two more countries on the continent, dealing another blow to battered poultry producers. Germany and Austria are the latest EU countries to report the discovery of dead swans infected with the H5N1 strain of avian influenza, which has spread from Asia to Africa, killed 91 people and led to the destruction of millions of birds. NORWAY OUT DENMARK OUT SWEDEN OUT NO THIRD PARTY SALES REUTERS/Henning Bagger/Scanpix

Dangerous information on a deadly virus

A call to censor scientific research on the deadly bird flu virus has global health officials debating whether such studies are worth the risk. Read our recap of a Harvard School of Public Health discussion on this subject, presented in collaboration with Reuters.  Learn More 

Climate change could raise cost of U.S. allergies

Related Topics

A bee collects pollen on a purple crocus in Darmstadt, March 21, 2010. REUTERS/Johannes Eisele

A bee collects pollen on a purple crocus in Darmstadt, March 21, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Johannes Eisele

WASHINGTON | Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:22am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Climate change could push the cost of U.S. allergies and asthma beyond the current $32 billion annual price tag, conservation and health groups reported on Wednesday.

A warming planet makes for longer growing seasons that would produce more allergy-provoking pollen in much of the heavily populated eastern two-thirds of the United States, the National Wildlife Federation and the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America said in their report.

The cost of coping with allergies and allergen-driven asthma in the United States is at $32 billion in direct medical costs, lost work days and lower productivity, the report said.

"Climate change could allow highly allergenic trees like oaks and hickories to start replacing pines, spruces and firs that generally don't cause allergies, exposing many more people to springtime allergy triggers," said Amanda Staudt, a climate scientist at the wildlife federation.

Spring-like conditions are already arriving 14 days earlier than 20 years ago, Staudt said.

In the fall, ragweed plants will grow larger and more loaded with pollen over a longer growing season, Staudt said in a telephone interview. There is also evidence that ragweed, the biggest U.S. allergy trigger, grows faster as carbon dioxide increases in the atmosphere.

Carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that spurs climate change, is emitted by human-made sources like fossil-fueled vehicles and coal-fired power plants as well as natural sources including human breath.

CARBON DIOXIDE CONNECTION

"With more carbon dioxide, each ragweed plant can produce more pollen and can even produce more allergenic pollen, so fall allergies are going to get a pretty big hit," Staudt said.

The average global temperature last year tied for the second highest year on record and the decade from 2000-2009 was the hottest on record, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

This means agricultural and natural growing zones are shifting northward, allowing pollen-bearing trees to survive over a wider range than they have historically, the report said.

About 10 million U.S. residents have so-called allergic asthma, in which asthma attacks are triggered by pollen or other airborne allergens. These attacks are likely to increase as global warming causes these allergens to become more widespread, numerous and potent, the report said.

Poison ivy, one of the top 10 medically problematic plants in the United States with more than 350,000 cases of contact dermatitis reported annually, would become more toxic and more widespread as the climate changes. When exposed to more carbon dioxide, poison ivy plants produce a more allergenic form of urushiol, the substance that makes skin itch.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Thermoguy wrote:
Houses and buildings can produce more indoor pollutants because of solar radiation. Los Angeles spends a reported 100-174 million dollars a year in energy costs reacting to urban heat islands. Urban Heat Islands were considered to be warmer urban areas, we couldn’t see that each building was being radiated by the sun and generating extreme heat the building isn’t insulated for. The heat transfers inside the building and we use air conditioning as a response. Air conditioning is really refrigeration and that alone contributes to humidity inside the building.

Paint your building, shade it but stop using absorbent exterior finishes because they are causing global warming and contributing to climate change while we respond to the symptoms with massive emissions.

Education of the world is blind to temperature so buildings are signed off as compliant with building codes. Here is a link to what we missed in the calculator. We did several years work to find the cause of urban heat islands, here are time-lapsed infrared videos. http://www.thermoguy.com/urbanheat.html Scroll down the page and you can see the effect inside the building.

We found the same problem in brand new housing, be careful what you buy or you have a sick building.

Apr 15, 2010 11:52am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.