SEC watchdog to fault Stanford probe: sources

WASHINGTON Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:26am EDT

Allen Stanford arrives at federal court in Houston wearing handcuffs and leg irons, October 14, 2009. REUTERS/Richard Carson

Allen Stanford arrives at federal court in Houston wearing handcuffs and leg irons, October 14, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Richard Carson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal watchdog is expected to soon release a report criticizing how the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission handled a probe of alleged swindler Allen Stanford, people familiar with the matter said on Tuesday.

The report by SEC Inspector General David Kotz is expected to be highly critical of the agency, unlike a narrowly focused report he released last July.

It comes as the agency has been trying to rebuild its reputation after missing Bernard Madoff's fraud.

Stanford is in a Texas jail awaiting trial on 21 criminal charges related to an alleged $7 billion scheme involving the issuance by his Antiguan bank of certificates of deposit (CDs) with improbably high interest rates.

Authorities accuse Stanford of running a Ponzi scheme, in which early investors are paid with the money from new clients.

Some of his former investors are blaming the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, a broker-dealer regulator, for not stopping the Texas financier sooner.

In his July report, Kotz concluded that the SEC did nothing wrong when it "stood down" on investigating Stanford at the request of federal prosecutors.

But the new report, which looks further back at the agency's dealings with Stanford, suggests the SEC dragged its feet in getting its own probe under way, the sources familiar with the report said.

The sources requested anonymity because Kotz's latest report is not yet public.

A spokesman for the SEC had no comment. Kotz's report is being reviewed by the agency's Freedom of Information Act office.

In February 2009, the SEC filed civil charges accusing Stanford and three of his companies with fraudulently selling billions of dollars of the fraudulent CDs.

The SEC's charges were announced two months after Madoff was arrested for orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme, which investigators have estimated at up to $65 billion.

The SEC has said it began investigating Stanford in 2005, and had been aware of complaints about his CDs even earlier.

But it has said it faced jurisdictional hurdles in pursuing an investigation against an offshore bank, in part because of a U.S. Supreme court ruling that limited its ability to regulate traditional bank products such as CDs.

In September, Kotz issued a report in which he found the SEC had bungled five probes that should have uncovered Madoff's fraud. Madoff pleaded guilty and is serving a 150-year sentence in a North Carolina federal prison.

(Reporting by Matthew Goldstein and Rachelle Younglai; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Textex wrote:
If you think Madoff and Stanford ran huge scams, Amway has ripped off millions of people for several decades, to the tune of 10s of billions of dollars.

Amway is a scam, and here’s why: Amway pays out as little money as they can get away with, so they support the higher level IBOs ripping off their downline via the tool scam.

As a result, about 99% of IBOs operate at a net loss, while the top 1% make several TIMES more from their Amway tool scam than from the Amway products. This was made illegal in the UK in 2008, but our FTC is unable to pull their heads out of their butts to stop it here.

Read about it on this website: http://thenetprofitgroup.yolasite.com and forward the information to everyone you know, so they don’t get scammed.

Apr 14, 2010 2:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
CarlosV wrote:
SEC and Florida’s state are RESPONSIBLE of this FRAUD! There was corruption in SEC and Florida to allow Stanford to sell CDs in USA.
Allen Stanford made a lot of “donations” to US-politicians in order to get free way to run his Ponzi scheme!

“John Cornyn: In November 2004, right after the election, Texas Sen. John Cornyn traveled to Antigua on Stanford’s. The purpose of the trip, which cost over $7,000? To investigate the financial industry. Too bad he didn’t seem to notice anything.”

The same happened with Senator Nelson from Florida.

This is already PUBLIC! Why some people want to hide the truth ???

Apr 14, 2010 4:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.