U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Sweden, Canada outrank U.S. on healthcare

People walk past L'Hopital de Montreal pour enfants (The Montreal Children's Hospital) in Montreal, Quebec March 31, 2009. REUTERS/Jumana El Heloueh

People walk past L'Hopital de Montreal pour enfants (The Montreal Children's Hospital) in Montreal, Quebec March 31, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Jumana El Heloueh

WASHINGTON | Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:10pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - People living in countries with government-run healthcare systems like Sweden and Canada are far more confident than Americans that their families can get good, affordable care, according to a 22-nation survey released on Thursday.

The Ipsos/Reuters online poll found 75 percent of Swedes and nearly 70 percent of Canadians thought it would be fairly easy to get treatment if a relative became ill, compared to just 51 percent of Americans.

Conducted while the U.S. Congress fought over sweeping changes to expand access to health insurance, the November 2009 to January 2010 survey found Americans were divided over their access to healthcare. The U.S. health reforms became law last month.

"Even at this very divisive time, half of the (U.S.) public was basically satisfied with their healthcare" said Darrell Bricker of Ipsos, a global survey-based market research company. "Americans are basically split on this."

The United States spends more than any other nation on healthcare -- roughly 16 percent of its economy -- but still has higher rates of infant mortality, diabetes and other illnesses than other rich countries.

Still, not all countries with a government hand in healthcare reported greater satisfaction, according to the poll, which surveyed more than 23,000 people worldwide.

Just 55 percent of residents in Britain, which has nationalized healthcare, expressed confidence while 45 percent of those in Germany thought it would be easy to access treatment.

In Japan, which provides universal medical care, just 15 percent said they thought a relative could easily get affordable, quality care. The Asian nation boasts a high life expectancy but is grappling with health costs as the elderly make up more than 40 percent of the population.

Other countries that ranked low in satisfaction included Hungary, Russia and South Korea -- all of which showed confidence in good care at less than 30 percent.

The survey also found that neighboring giants India and China had vastly different experiences, with 64 percent of Indians citing confidence, putting them fifth behind the Netherlands. In China, 34 percent said they thought they could get good care.

Across all countries, women, adults younger than 55, the poor and the less-educated reported lower satisfaction with their access to healthcare, the survey found.

Ipsos surveyed 23,351 adults in 22 nations that account for 75 percent of the world's gross domestic product.

Countries polled were: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Britain, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden and the United States.

Respondents were recruited and screened, then results were balanced to reflect the country's demographics, according to Ipsos. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.1 percent.

(Reporting by Susan Heavey; editing by Chris Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (43)
StarLine wrote:
I am not against anything,
but just want to say that there should be both government-run healthcare systems and privately-run healthcare systems.
By having 2 systems, than 1 system, it will serve as a balance to prevent things like healthcare cost from going way to high, or limited services provided.

Apr 15, 2010 11:07am EDT  --  Report as abuse
kayo wrote:
This survey is phony. You can only compare infant mortality when the causes are evaluated the same. Obviously, if you are paying 50% of your income for health care in a government plan, you would be ,ore likely to say you can get health care if needed.

Apr 15, 2010 11:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MANDORANDO wrote:
Who in the us have you poled?

you are the only organization stating this

Pole real people not this foney nonsence.

If you work for healthcare you have good

healthcare. If you reley on free crap

you get crap. Worst than that! It’s crap

I have to pay for!

Apr 15, 2010 11:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.