Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Message of humility
A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
Recommended Newsletters
Farmer's daughter Senator takes on Wall Street
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senator Blanche Lincoln, a self-styled "farmer's daughter" facing a tough re-election race in Arkansas, had not been expected to become the latest Democrat to rail against the risky practices of Wall Street.
Lincoln, chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, is known for working across party lines on issues, but took Washington by surprise with an aggressive draft bill to be unveiled on Friday that she hopes will force big banks out of the $450 trillion over-the-counter derivatives market.
"My bill will put banks back into the business of banking and prevent future bailouts of Wall Street firms engaging in risky behavior," Lincoln said in a statement.
But three weeks ago, Lincoln had a more measured approach in a speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has urged restraint from lawmakers considering financial reforms.
"The swaps market will be regulated, but let me say this: I don't believe in overreaching, or regulation for regulation's sake. We must be surgical with how we regulate," she said.
Lincoln's bill had been expected to take a more moderate tack than those approved by the Senate Banking Committee and the House of Representatives -- bills that need to be reconciled before President Barack Obama can sign reforms into law.
Instead, the draft is tougher, and includes "radical" curbs for banks, according to a Washington-based industry representative following the issue who asked not to be named.
"It's a huge shift," that person said. "I think as much of this is politics as it is trying to get the right policy."
The bill is being closely watched by Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America, which dominate the market.
MISPERCEPTION THAT LINCOLN A LIGHT TOUCH
Derivatives have been blamed for amplifying financial turmoil in 2008 as the world slipped into recession.
Those surprised by the tough bill were "hearing what they wanted to hear," if they expected Lincoln would have a moderate touch on derivatives, a top Lincoln aide said.
"Blanche Lincoln is very much a centrist, has always been, but we're in the midst of a financial catastrophe, so it shouldn't surprise anyone that a centrist ... will see that we have to do some reforms," aide Robert Holifield told Reuters.
The banking restrictions were discussed "conceptually" with Republican staffers but were kept quiet.
"Some ideas, the more they are out there, the more chance that well-paid lobbyists can descend and fight them," said Holifield, who has worked with Lincoln and the top U.S. futures regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, for 10 years. "We expect that fight will be coming."
NOVEMBER ELECTION LOOMS
Lincoln's tough line on swaps reform could be an electoral blessing, after she came under criticism for supporting the financial bailout and health care reform.
With mid-term elections looming, and one third of Senate seats up for grabs along with all 435 in the House in November, she trails potential Republican opponents, and first must defeat two challengers in the Democratic primary on May 18.
While Lincoln's folksy, deliberative approach has played well in her two-decade career, now voters want action. "They want someone ... to lead them," said Blake Rutherford, a political analyst in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Swaps reform also could allow Democrats to blunt Republican gains in Congress that are forecast to be sizable. Republicans are trying to capitalize on a sluggish economic recovery and fears that health care reform will be a burden on taxpayers.
Saxby Chambliss, senior Republican on the Agriculture Committee, blamed the White House for collapse of negotiations with Lincoln. Chambliss is a frequent partner on Lincoln's proposals and was expected to write a swaps bill with her.
"It seems the administration is more interested in trying to divert attention away from health care by changing the subject as we head into the election season," Chambliss said.
Former congressman Charlie Stenholm said Lincoln had a record of "looking for a sensible solution.
"In this environment, it may be impossible to get bipartisan agreement on anything, even whether the sun is going to rise in the east," said Stenholm, now a private consultant.
CAUGHT IN POLITICAL CROSSFIRE
Lincoln served three terms in the House and then, in 1998, she became the youngest woman elected to the Senate, at age 38. Last fall, she became the first woman to chair the Agriculture Committee, which oversees futures markets.
She attracted flack from Democrats last year when she opposed the public option in the health care reform bill. She supports a Republican move to stop the regulation of greenhouse gases, and also helped block approval of a union lawyer nominated to the National Labor Relations Board.
"This senator is caught in the crossfire between people who think she's not liberal enough and people who think she's not conservative enough," said Frank Rehermann, a California rice farmer, when introducing Lincoln after a February fundraiser.
Lincoln, who grew up on a seventh-generation Arkansas rice farm, often draws on her family roots to explain why she seeks common ground on divisive political issues.
The bill has been hailed by critics of Wall Street like Senator Maria Cantwell, who had urged her to be aggressive.
"As the daughter of a farmer, she knows the difference between farmers legitimately hedging and Wall Street speculators cooking up toxic assets," Cantwell said.
(Additional reporting by Christopher Doering; Editing by Russell Blinch and Walter Bagley)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
REMEMBER in NOVEMBER,
Blanche, you commie rat traitor, YOU ARE GOING DOWN in November!
FREEDOM! LIBERTY! CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!
The Federal Government was created by the constitution to enact and protect the people from interests which by their nature are infinitely more powerful than the individual and local communities thanks to their national scope.
The Federal Government is the ONLY entity whose role ENSHRINES protection of the people, for it is a creation of the people – per the constitution.
Those that demonize the federal government and say it’s socialism to allow the Federal Government its proper constitutional role in ensuring business plays fair and by the rules are in effect saying the people of the United States have no role in determining the broader future of our own nation.
For without the Federal Government to make the will of the people reality, we are left at the mercy of corporations and foreign and domestic and the oligarchs who run them.
The will of the people is NOT Socialism therefore the goal of the Federal Government is NOT socialism.
The will of the people is clear though, they want a fair and just society, one where what’s best for society is determined by more than “profit at any cost” and “vision of he oligarchs” the dubious “better” alternative offered by those who keep retelling the lies that Government always messes things up.
Government is often the ONLY option the only entity capable and willing to do the necessarily UNprofitable chores all societies need doing to keep society healthy and moving forward. NO private company would ever step in and give seniors the healthcare they need at an affordable price.
The profit motivated corporation that will NOT canNOT do them, because they are UNprofitable, and their charter states profit is their goal.
Americans do NOT want a Adam Smith, David Cooperfield world where the ruthless run everyone into the ground.
They want a balance, where the extremes of the free market that are absolutely deadly to a freedom are curbed by the sole national agent of the people the Federal Govt. via regulations and laws that make the kinds of gambling casino capitalism illegal.
Government doesn’t have to own anything, but it must have the power to encourage, direct prevent private companies towards activities that benefit the whole society.
The notion that the “profit motive” and the “capitalist spirit” is enough to ensure companies will pursue a course that benefits not only themselves but the nation is utter idiotic, myopic, unthinking nonsense.
It adds nothing to the debate and is simply partisan and empty regurgitation of negative slurs you read on Fox news.
I am a centrist from Canada and I am absolutely appalled that anyone would be upset that the regulation of Wall street/banks is necessary. Where were you when your ex president was creating chaos as his legacy?
The constitution is for the people and Obama is working for all Americans if you would let him. The Wall street elitists are for profit for themselves no matter who gets hurt… and investors and the world economy have suffered.
Ill gotten gain should be important to yourself as well.





Follow Reuters