U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Obama seen making quick Supreme Court pick

Related Topics

President Barack Obama makes remarks at the White House Conference on America's Great Outdoors at the Department of the Interior in Washington, April 16, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young

President Barack Obama makes remarks at the White House Conference on America's Great Outdoors at the Department of the Interior in Washington, April 16, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

WASHINGTON | Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:54am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Whether President Barack Obama looks to a moderate or a liberal as his second Supreme Court nominee, one thing is certain -- with critical congressional elections looming in November, he will make his selection quickly.

The president will announce his candidate within the next several weeks, a White House official said, with the news generally seen coming in the first part of May.

The White House has not said who is on the list but among those being considered are several appeals court judges -- who would join a court filled with former judges -- and several less traditional picks, including one of the administration's top lawyers, a Cabinet secretary and a governor.

Obama is meeting Wednesday with Republican and Democratic senators as he seeks support in selecting a nominee to fill the seat being vacated by Justice John Paul Stevens, considered the high court's leading liberal.

For now, staff members are gathering information about a range of candidates and Obama is not expected to speak directly with any until after the talks Wednesday with senators.

"I would make sure that you understand that we're in a process of expanding that list and giving the president as many options as he desires to make an important selection," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters this week.

Analysts said it makes sense for Obama to get through a distracting confirmation process as soon as possible before elections in November in which his Democrats will be fighting to keep their majorities Congress.

"They've got plenty of stuff on their legislative agenda that this is going to suck energy from," said Russell Wheeler, a court expert at the Brookings Institution in Washington. "They'd just as soon keep this as far away from the mid-term election as possible."

Obama has indicated that he is open to selecting a candidate who has had a career as a politician or a policymaker, rather than considering only judges.

Nominating a Democratic politician -- or any judicial figure seen as too liberal -- could drag the White House into a fight with Republicans that might distract from legislative priorities like climate change and financial reform.

Stevens leads the court's liberal bloc but also has been a consensus builder whose forceful personality could persuade fellow justices to win majority support for his opinions.

Administration officials have said the White House is not looking to nominate someone to be a minority liberal voice, however powerful, but wants a bridge builder like Stevens.

FIGHT WITH REPUBLICANS

Obama's pick will not change the ideological balance of the court, which now has five conservatives and four liberals, but the White House says it expects a fight, no matter who Obama nominates.

"Whether or not we have entered a phase in our politics where a fight on anybody can be avoided, I don't know the answer to that," Gibbs said.

Analysts said it is in the White House's interest to make opposition Republicans seem intransigent and unreasonable, as they seek to ward off opposition to any nominee.

One of the top contenders for the job is Elena Kagan, 49, whom Obama chose as the first female U.S. solicitor general, a job in which she represents the U.S. government before the Supreme Court. She benefits from having been through a successful confirmation process.

Also seen as leading candidates are Merrick Garland, 57, a U.S. appeals judge in Washington seen viewed as a more moderate pick likely to appeal more to Republicans, and Diane Wood, 59, a Chicago appeals judge who knows Obama from teaching at the University of Chicago law school, but is seen as more liberal.

Other names mentioned by administration officials include Sidney Thomas, 56, a Montana native now an appeals court judge in California who would broaden the geographic representation on a court dominated by former judges from the Northeast.

Two possible choices from outside the courthouse are Democratic Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, 51, and Janet Napolitano, 52, Obama's homeland security secretary and the former Democratic governor of Arizona.

Obama's first nominee, Sonia Sotomayor, the first Hispanic justice and only the third woman ever on the court, was confirmed last year by a 68-31 vote after a heated battle.

Conservatives had questioned Sotomayor's impartiality and she was targeted in an Internet clip in which she commented that a "wise Latina" might reach a better decision than a white man.

(Additional reporting by Caren Bohan, Editing by Alistair Bell and Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
mickrussom wrote:
Get ready for a fight Obama, we aren’t letting you put another America hating Chavez-Castro-Putin bootlicking traitor on the high court.

If you support Obama and his Regime, you support an Statist authoritarian who is an empty suit who speaks in platitudes who is beholden to the oligarchical collectivists and banking cabals. You are against freedom, liberty and our constitutional republic and the notion that all of our rights are inborn and are given by our creator. Some autocrat in Washington does not grant rights – the constitution simply enumerates them for added protection. The constitution also limits the Powers of the Federal Government yet an expansionist authoritarian view is used in modern times contrary to what Madison had intended. If you support Obama you support the biggest threat to our free will in our history, and when the last bastion of freedom in the USA falls, there is nowhere else to go.

Apr 17, 2010 6:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.