Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by tornado

A huge tornado tears through the Oklahoma City suburb of Moore, killing dozens.  Slideshow 

Photo

Nuclear tsunami wall

Safety upgrades designed to prevent a repeat of the Fukushima disaster.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

North Korea denies it sank South's navy ship

Salvage team members and rescue workers put a part of a sunken naval vessel on a barge after they lifted it with a giant crane, off Baengnyeongdo island near the maritime border with North Korea, northwest of Seoul April 15, 2010. REUTERS/Lim Hun-jung/Yonhap

Salvage team members and rescue workers put a part of a sunken naval vessel on a barge after they lifted it with a giant crane, off Baengnyeongdo island near the maritime border with North Korea, northwest of Seoul April 15, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Lim Hun-jung/Yonhap

SEOUL | Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:20am EDT

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea on Saturday denied that it sank a South Korean naval vessel near their disputed sea border late last month.

There has been growing speculation in the South that the ship had been hit by a North Korean torpedo, killing 46 sailors and raising fears it could trigger conflict on the divided peninsula.

The North's KCNA news agency accused the conservative government in Seoul of trying to foist blame on its reclusive neighbor to boost sagging support ahead of local elections in the South in June.

"The puppet military warmongers, right-wing conservative politicians and the group of other traitors in South Korea are now foolishly seeking to link the accident with the north at any cost," the North's KCNA news agency quoted an unnamed military commentator as saying.

"Another sinister aim sought by the puppet regime in floating the ... story is to justify the persistent and anachronistic policy toward the DPRK (North Korea) and shirk the blame for having driven the inter-Korean relations to the worst crisis."

South Korea, which has already brought some of the wreck to the surface, has said the blast that sank the vessel was caused by an external explosion.

Investigators from several countries, including the United States, are trying to determine what caused the 1,200-tonne Cheonan to split in half and plunge some 45 meters (148 feet).

South Korea's defense minister said this month it may have been hit by a torpedo, immediately thrusting suspicion on the North.

Local media has pinned the blame on North Korea in the absence of any other likely reasons, though official statements have been far more circumspect.

Few expect the South, worried about hurting its own economy in the midst of recovery, to risk taking military action against the North if investigations show Pyongyang sank the ship.

It is a delicate time for President Lee Myung-bak, whose relatively high ratings in opinion polls have dipped slightly following the sinking.

His defense minister and the military have come under some criticism for being slow over their handling of the issue.

Lee wants a strong showing in the June elections to give him the political muscle he needs to push through more reforms, which have been floundering in an unruly parliament, even though it is dominated by his ruling party.

Relations between the two Koreas have been chilly since Lee took office early in 2008, ending years of generous aid which had helped prop up the North's broken economy.

South Korea raised the stern of the ship on Friday and expects to bring the rest to the surface in the next few days, as it searches for clues to one if its deadliest naval disasters since the 1950-53 Korean War ended in a ceasefire.

The sinking could also complicate the resumption of stalled international talks on ending North Korea's atomic arms program in return for aid to prop up its broken economy, experts said.

(Additional reporting by Suh Kyungmin; Writing by Jonathan Thatcher; Editing by Bill Tarrant)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
omelresl wrote:
Looking at this, I have a notion of feeling that it wasn’t actually the North attacking, it may of been some counterpart or security alliance to do with the U.S who may want something to erupt, as it shows in the media nothing is being thought of if the u.s was involved in some kind of conspiracy or to make people believe that the North wants to attack teh South, everyone who does believe that the North wants to attack, then why don’t they, it’ss because they don’t want to, there is history between both, and families apart, only the media and certain keyed political people will be involved in masterminding a fake attack against the south so they kill each other. Am actually speaking the truth as I closely montior tthe media and political media, be careful on what to believe, don’t judge or believe any politician especially from the west as they are regarded to be puppets, poppuets of whom are controlled by an elite group of people whom are called the bilderberg group, very secret in what they do, but as you know money controls everything from bribes to whatever, bilderberg use that as a counterattack on creating world domination using the banking system.

anyhow if this comment does not get through, I so then believe, that obviously this does not need broadcasted, as to why the bilderberg are behind everything.

But if whoever is looking at this, then you think, why arn’t the people allowed to see this, remember freedom of speech is the most powerful key to this world.

Apr 17, 2010 1:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
richnorm wrote:
I’m sorry, but just the idea that a country wouldn’t retaliate against another country that intentionally sank a military vessel is just beyond belief. I don’t care what the situation is. If a US ship was sunk by anyone, we (Americans) would expect a ten-fold retaliation. Then maybe think about stopping, depending on how fast the other appologized.

Apr 17, 2010 1:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Cali099 wrote:
richnorm – North Korea has thousands of missiles aimed right at Seoul, the capital of South Korea. The reason South Korea is cautious with their actions is because mimicking the United States policy of “Shoot first, ask later” could easily result in the complete destruction of their largest cities with millions dead and a crippled economy.

Their situation is no different than when The Soviet Union had nuclear missiles aimed at our largest cities from Cuba. You probably aren’t old enough to have learned about this in your history class yet, but at that time we had to be cautious about our actions towards the Soviet or Cuba, because one misstep could easily have triggered the death of millions of US citizens.

South Korea is right to be cautious about how they handle this situation. Unlike the US they have had to deal with the consequences of War when it’s fought next door. Our wars are always thousands of miles away against countries with piss ant threats.

Apr 17, 2010 2:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.