Oklahoma lawmakers to sue over federal health reform

Opponents of the proposed U.S. health care bill are pictured during a rally outside the Capitol Building in Washington, March 21, 2010. REUTERS/Jason Reed

Opponents of the proposed U.S. health care bill are pictured during a rally outside the Capitol Building in Washington, March 21, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

CHICAGO | Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:44pm EDT

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Leaders of the Oklahoma House and Senate said on Tuesday they plan to file a lawsuit to block President Barack Obama's reform of the U.S. healthcare system.

House Speaker Chris Benge and Senate President Pro Tempore Glenn Coffee, both Republicans, said they plan to sue the U.S. Congress, president and U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services to prevent provisions of the act Obama signed into law last month from taking effect.

Their announcement follows the refusal earlier this month of Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson to join a multi-state lawsuit led by Florida's attorney general. Edmondson, a Democrat, said he would join the lawsuit if required by legislative action.

"Our concern is that the attorney general's effort would be lackluster, at best. We have an obligation to our citizens to challenge this unconstitutional bill, which will lead to unprecedented control of a large portion of the U.S. economy," Benge said in a statement. "The high taxes required in the law will be a burden that we cannot afford."

A resolution authorizing the legislative leaders to file the lawsuit and allowing Oklahoma residents to opt out of mandated health insurance is heading toward final passage.

There have been conflicts in other states, with governors and attorneys general of disparate parties disagreeing on the litigation.

So far, 20 states are participating in, or have announced plans to join, in the lawsuit filed on March 23 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. It claims the reform of the $2.5 trillion U.S. healthcare system, pushed through by congressional Democrats after months of bitter partisan fighting, violates state government rights in the U.S. Constitution and will force massive new spending on hard-pressed states.

Florida's Attorney General Bill McCollum, a Republican who is running for governor, said on Tuesday that Alaska was the latest state to join the Florida-led complaint.

Separately, Virginia has filed a lawsuit, arguing the new law's requirements that most Americans buy health insurance clash with a state law that exempts Virginians from federal fines to be imposed for not owning health insurance.

The U.S. Justice Department has said it will vigorously fight any challenges to the new healthcare law, which it insists is constitutional. The White House has also said it believes the suits will fail.

(Reporting by Karen Pierog; Editing by Kenneth Barry)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
Velmaa1 wrote:
It is just hard to believe that there are so many irresponsible people in government today. They are doing this for political reasons only and not for the good of the people. If they want to block the law, block all of it, including the part that allows a child to stay covered by their parent’s insurance until age 26, the part that guarantees those who cannot afford coverage, the ability to buy insurance at reduced rates, the portion that says that insurance companies cannot drop you because of illness or pre existing condition. Reject all of it and tell your people you are trying to help them. I have never seen such foolish and irresponsible behavior before. It is all to mask the unhappiness with this African American president who gets things done!! It is scary the number of stupid people who hold office today!!

Apr 20, 2010 4:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bck555 wrote:
Good going Oklahoma! The whole bill needs rejection and found unconstitutional. Then the whole thing can be replace by a rational, measured, and cost effective solution. The few good things mentioned by Velmass1 can be reinstituted if appropriate, or perhaps improved when a viable bill is passed, while the rest of the flawed bill can be scrapped.

Apr 20, 2010 6:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Soonerdiver wrote:
For “Velmaa1″… race has nothing to do with the issue. The only way this President gets things done is to bribe, or threaten; that aside the bill is just a very poorly written bill (what I have read).

I do not think anyone, your President included, who has read the total package.

So please get off the race card and say something that is relevant to the issue of the article.

Apr 21, 2010 12:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.