Fitch Rates Johnson County, KS' GO Bonds 'AAA' & Johnson County Pub Building Commission Revs 'AA+'
* Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.
NEW YORK--(Business Wire)-- Fitch Ratings assigns its 'AAA' rating to the following Johnson County, Kansas (the county) bonds: --$9.01 million internal improvement refunding bonds, series 2010A; --$4.62 million library improvement refunding bonds, series 2010B. Fitch also rates the following Johnson County Public Building Commission, Kansas (the PBC) bonds 'AA+': --$13.245 million taxable lease purchase revenue bonds, series 2010A; --$6.34 million lease purchase revenue refunding bonds, series 2010B; --$31.945 million lease purchase revenue refunding bonds, series 2010C. The bonds are expected to sell via competitive sale on April 29, 2010. In addition, Fitch affirms the following Johnson County, Kansas bonds at 'AAA': --$20.925 million outstanding internal improvement bonds, series 2009B; --$16.855 million outstanding internal improvement refunding bonds, series 2009C. The Rating Outlook is Stable. Fitch will recalibrate the ratings on the above referenced bonds on April 30, 2010 as described in the March 25, 2010 report 'Recalibration of U.S. Public Finance Ratings', available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. At that time the ratings will be revised as described below. --The ratings on the county series 2009B, 2009C, 2010A and 2010B will remain 'AAA' with a Stable Outlook. --The ratings on the PBC series 2010A, 2010B, and 2010C bonds will remain 'AA+' with a Stable Outlook. RATING RATIONALE: --Johnson County is an affluent, well-educated community located proximate to Kansas City. --The county's local economy is deep and diverse, further augmented by numerous career opportunities throughout the Kansas City metropolitan region. --Residents display an above average socioeconomic profile. --The county continues to generate operating surpluses and strong financial margins despite the current economic recession. --Officials have demonstrated consistent judicious financial supervision. --The overall debt burden is manageable and amortizes fairly quickly; coupled with a supportable five-year capital improvement plan. RATING DRIVERS: --The county's ability to maintain strong financial flexibility given projected declines in assessed valuation coupled with the general malaise of the current economic environment. --The county's ability to swiftly reduce expenditures if potentially volatile sales and use tax revenue sources decline precipitously. SECURITY: The county series 2010A bonds are valid and binding general obligations (GO) of the county payable from its ad valorem tax, without limitation as to rate or amount, on all taxable property within the county. The county series 2010B bonds are valid and binding GOs of the county payable from it ad valorem tax, without limitation as to rate or amount, on all taxable property within the county except within the Cities of Olathe and Bonner Springs, which together account for 17.1% of the county's total assessed valuation. The PBC bonds are special obligations payable solely from lease payments made by Johnson County from any legally available funds. The county's obligation is absolute and unconditional without abatement, set-off or counterclaim. The obligation is not subject to annual appropriation. The lease shall not terminate so long as bonds are outstanding. CREDIT SUMMARY: Johnson County, Kansas is advantageously located 12 miles southwest of the City of Kansas City, providing easy access to numerous employment opportunities throughout the metropolitan region. The county's own local economy is deep and diverse, anchored by telecommunications firms such as Sprint Corporation and Century Link - which together employ roughly 11,000 people - healthcare, government, and engineering services. Johnson County is home to the corporate headquarters of Applebee's International, Garmin Ltd., Black & Veatch, and Sprint Corporation. The county's population has grown 21.5% since 2000, and as of 2009 totaled 548,122, making Johnson County the most populous county in the state. Wealth levels are above average with 2008 county per capita income levels equaling 146% and 138% of the state and national averages, respectively. The county's residents are well-educated with 51% achieving higher education verse 27% for the national average. Historically, Johnson County had experienced consistent assessed valuation growth; however, such growth has tapered off recently given the national recession. Assessed valuation declined 3.2% in 2010, and is projected to decline 5.6% in 2011, and between 2%-4% in 2012. Thereafter, a positive trend is projected. Despite the wobble, full market value is still substantial at over $63.2 billion or $115,319 per capita. Also, the county continues to experience new construction growth, albeit at a much lower rate. As housing prices did not experience unsustainable increases during the boom years, the prices are also not experiencing dramatic declines. As a result, county residential foreclosure rates are conspicuously below the national average. The county consistently has maintained substantial financial reserves, providing the necessary cushion to withstand near-term economic and financial uncertainty. The county has a formal fund balance policy to maintain at least a 10% to 15% unreserved general fund balance, a percentage the county presently far exceeds. For fiscal 2008, the county ended the year with an $81.6 million unreserved general fund balance or 31% of spending. Preliminary unaudited fiscal 2009 numbers indicate the county ended the year with a 4.2% general fund operating surplus and increased its total general fund balance to $102.3 million or 41% of spending. Despite a 5.3% decline in general fund revenues from the year prior, the county was able to achieve the operating surplus through various cost savings measures including foregoing merit raises, not filling vacant positions, and reducing capital spending. Prospectively, the county is anticipating balanced operations for fiscal 2010 through further expenditure reductions as its primary means of balancing the budget. The county is considering drawing down its ample fund balance in out-years, however, in all cases plans to maintain at least a 20% unreserved balance. Historically the county experienced consistent robust growth in property tax and sales tax revenues, so accompanying expenditure increases were not a concern. Given the current environment, the county is closely scrutinizing its expenditure efficiencies and staffing requirements. Johnson County's overall net debt burden is manageable at $4,136 per capita or 3.6% of true value, with the majority of debt attributable to overlapping school districts. Direct debt is a minuscule $356 per capita or 0.3% of true value. The county's five-year capital improvement plan is moderate at $100 million, of which 60% is anticipated to be issued as self-supporting wastewater debt. Of a more uncertain nature, the county is considering issuing upwards of $300 million for a new county courthouse. However, the size of the plan is scalable and is not expected to occur for at least another four years. Proceeds for the county series 2010A transaction will be used to currently refund series 2002A bonds for a cost savings. Proceeds for the county series 2010B transaction will be used to currently refund series 1998B, series 2001B, and series 2002C bonds for a cost savings. Proceeds for the PBC series 2010A transaction will be used to construct a new public works facility. Proceeds for the PBC series 2010B transaction will be used to currently refund series 2002A and series 2002B bonds for a cost savings. Proceeds for the PBC series 2010C transaction will be used to crossover refund series 2003A and 2004A bonds for a cost savings. Applicable criteria available on Fitch's website at 'www.fitchratings.com' include: --'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Dec. 21, 2009); --'U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Dec. 21, 2009). Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE. Fitch Ratings James Mann, 212-908-9148, New York Dana Sodikoff, 312-368-3215, Chicago or Media Relations: Cindy Stoller, 212-908-0526, New York Email: cindy.stoller@fitchratings.com Copyright Business Wire 2010
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.



Follow Reuters