Obama scolds Wall St for resisting reform

Related Video

1 of 9. President Barack Obama delivers remarks on Wall Street reform at Cooper Union in New York City, April 22, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

NEW YORK | Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:11pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - President Barack Obama scolded Wall Street on Thursday for its "furious efforts" to fight tighter regulation, saying the United States was doomed to another financial crisis if reforms were not implemented

With confidence growing at the White House that Congress will approve restrictions on how big banks operate, Democratic Leader Harry Reid set a vote for Monday evening that could clear the way for a Senate debate on the overhaul.

In a speech in New York attended by several Wall Street executives, Obama blamed the financial meltdown and the recession that followed on a "failure of responsibility" by both Washington and Wall Street.

His speech offered no new policy but tapped into public fury at big banks and pushed a Democratic regulatory reform bill that is gaining traction in the Senate after months of voluble opposition by the Republican minority.

"A free market was never meant to be a free license to take whatever you can get, however you can get it," Obama said. "One of the most significant contributors to this recession was a financial crisis as dire as any we've known in generations."

He said the legislation would significantly improve the current flawed regulatory structure, "despite the furious efforts of industry lobbyists" to try to weaken it.

Obama, who has in the past referred to Wall Street executives as "fat cats," said some of the huge pay packages in the industry encouraged "perverse incentives to take reckless risks," although he added that he does not begrudge anyone success "when that success is earned."

OBAMA'S TOUGH RHETORIC

The audience, many of them students and professors, applauded loudly at some of Obama's tougher rhetoric.

He spoke at the historic Great Hall at Cooper Union college in Manhattan, the venue for several notable addresses. Abraham Lincoln once argued there against the expansion of slavery in a speech that helped his 1860 presidential victory.

Cooper Union was also the site of a speech Obama gave on financial reform during the 2008 presidential election campaign. Democrats hope cracking down on Wall Street will help them win voter support at congressional elections in November.

One of Obama's aims in the speech was to put pressure on Republicans to support reform legislation amid signs several in the opposition party may be willing to back the bill.

The legislation got a boost from fraud charges brought against Wall Street powerhouse Goldman Sachs last week, and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said he was "absolutely confident" that the reforms will happen.

Senate Democratic Leader Reid on Thursday set a 5 p.m. (2100 GMT) vote for Monday that could clear the way for the Senate to begin debating the bill.

In an effort to reach a bipartisan agreement, senators were continuing to negotiate on aspects of the legislation, which aims to curb Wall Street excesses and protect taxpayers from future bailouts.

"If you just listen to the tone of the last couple of days, it's changed. I spent a huge amount of time with Republicans over the last few weeks ... and I think they really want to be for this," Geithner told CBS's "The Early Show."

Wall Street is becoming increasingly resigned to Congress approving financial reform, which would hand Obama another win after his healthcare overhaul was passed in March, but Obama's speech ruffled some in the financial world.

"To go to Wall Street and tell Wall Street that the populist rhetoric coming from the White House is not divisive, it is disingenuous," said Marshall Front, chairman of investment counseling firm Front Barnett Associates.

SMILING GOLDMAN CEO

Reinforcing Obama's message to Wall Street, White House economic adviser Larry Summers said in an interview later with PBS that failure to reform financial regulations would impair business confidence in the financial system.

Obama addressed an audience of about 700 people, including financial industry leaders, members of the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, local officials and Cooper Union students and faculty.

Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein attended the speech, as did senior executives from other banks.

"Blankfein was in a good mood. He had a smile on his face and good humor," said Richard Richman, a housing developer and property owner based in Connecticut, who was at the speech.

The White House has signaled increasing optimism over the reforms and is targeting moderate Republican senators.

Democrats hold a 59-41 vote majority over Republicans in the Senate -- one vote short of the number needed to overcome procedural hurdles to the bill's passage.

House of Representatives Republican leader John Boehner, in an opinion piece in Investors Business Daily, labeled the measure a "job-killing initiative" and said it "would provide the nation's largest financial firms with permanent bailouts."

The financial reform bill authored by Democratic Senator Christopher Dodd would bring new oversight to hedge funds and derivatives while cracking down on risky bank trading and putting in place protections for consumers of financial products.

It would also establish a system for unwinding troubled financial companies to prevent a repeat of catastrophes such as the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008.

Among elements deemed by Obama to be essential in the reforms was the "Volcker Rule," which would ban banks from engaging in proprietary trading, or trading for their own account. It is named after former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, an outside adviser to Obama who attended the speech.

(Additional reporting by Steve Eder, Ross Colvin, Matt Spetalnick and Tabassum Zakaria; Editing by Eric Beech)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
HonestCitizen wrote:
I think we already have enough rules and laws regarding banks and investment houses. What we really need is an honest government that is willing to enforce the existing laws and accounting rules. The SEC just recently accused Goldman Sacs of fraud in a civil action. I heard that the SEC has not prosecuted any other financial institution for over eight years. What were they thinking as this financial crisis started unfolding and it became apparent to everyone that fraud was occuring everywhere, even at the Federal Reserve Bank level. Why haven’t these crooks been prosecuted and jailed? Why hasn’t anyone in our government pushed for their criminal prosecutions? Let’s get tougher on our government before we worry about the wall street crooks that should already be in jail.

Apr 22, 2010 3:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
colonelP wrote:
“tap into widespread anger”? Why didn’t journalists use terms like that when the Bush/Cheney co-presidency existed? They could have alternated between “tap into widespread :anger, fear, ignorance, racism, imperialism, superiority complex, propagandized minds, and much more. Why now?

Apr 22, 2010 6:45am EDT  --  Report as abuse
jebahoula wrote:
The media’s fanfare about SEC fraud charges against Goldman Sachs is designed to scare politicians into passing the so-called financial reform bill that is before Congress, which will increase the power of the monopoly banks, reduce competition from financial institutions and ultimately raise borrowing costs to consumers and lower returns to investors.

This Bill will give to the Federal Reserve, a puppet of the huge monopoly banks, control over their remaining banking competition, what their media calls the “shadow banking system”. This competition is composed of financial institutions, such as, Fidelity, Vanguard, Charles Schwab, American Century, etc… which act like banks with checking accounts, savings, mutual funds, lending and brokerage services.

Contrary to the media hype of a “new” financial order, the recent financial crisis created by the Federal Reserve has eliminated banking competition and kept the “old” financial order in power that has governed since the reign of Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865).

In three years these monopoly banks have bankrupt, bought, or gained control of much of their banking competition, from Lehman Brothers to CIT.

It should be no surprise that the largest monopoly banks left in power are Goldman Sachs, Citibank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Mellon Bank of New York and Morgan Stanley.

All, except Bank of America, are part of the “old” financial order that mushroomed into power about 150 years ago during and after Lincoln’s Tax War. Remember, Lincoln declared in his First Inaugural Speech (paragraphs 4, 21 and 32) that he started his war solely to collect his new 40% import tax from Southerners under the Morrill Tariff Act of 1861.

With the passage of his National Bank Act of 1863, Abraham Lincoln, a puppet of Northern banks and industries, re-established Alexander Hamilton’s centralist banking system in the United States, which set the foundation for the present day Federal Reserve System.

Under his First Legal Tender Act of 1862, Lincoln printed worthless paper money displaying images of Alexander Hamilton and Lincoln’s Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase (as in Chase Bank), which ultimately destroyed State banking.

Consumers and small businesses will have to lick the boots of the few elitist banks of the “old” financial order to obtain a loan. Investors and savers will have few options in their choices for high yields and returns on their investments.

Right now these monopoly banks are borrowing from the Federal Reserve at 1% and lending to consumers, via credit cards, at up to 30%. Price gouging is always the result of establishing monopolies.

Apr 22, 2010 7:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.