Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
The SpaceX mission
A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station. Slideshow
Camera screens can slash colon cancer deaths: study
LONDON |
LONDON (Reuters) - Screening 55 to 64-year-olds with an examination of the lower colon and rectum using a small camera can cut death rates from colorectal cancer by 43 percent, British scientists said on Wednesday.
Colorectal cancer is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide, accounting for more than a million cases and around 600,000 deaths every year.
Beating the disease is strongly linked to how early it is detected, with survival rates of around 90 percent for cancers that are found early and have not spread.
Many developed countries have introduced screening programs using a fecal occult blood test, which can detect early cases and reduce death rates by around 15 percent.
But Wendy Atkin from Imperial College London and Jane Wardle from University College London said their study showed more lives, and money, could be saved if screening used sigmoidoscopy -- a small, flexible camera that is inserted into the rectum.
"Economic analyses suggest ... a once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screen at age 55 or 60 years would be cost saving, largely because of the avoided costs of treatment," they wrote.
Some of the newest drugs in colon cancer -- such as Roche's Avastin, Vectibix from Amgen and Erbitux from Merck KGaA -- can cost thousands of euros a month.
Atkin said in a telephone interview her conclusion that sigmoidoscopy screening would save money was based on previous studies showing it was cost effective in preventing the need to treat so many patients with such expensive medicines.
"There's a real problem about the affordability of these drugs," she said. "But one way to make them more available is to reduce the numbers who develop these cancers with screening."
Cancer screening programs in developed nations have come under close scrutiny in recent months with some European studies suggesting national breast cancer screening programs do little to reduce death rates and research in the United States showing that prostate cancer screens lead to widespread overdiagnosis.
Commenting on the study, which was published in The Lancet medical journal, David Ransohoff of the University of North Carolina said the findings showed that for this test and this type of cancer, screening appeared to be well worth while.
"The good news is that this size of benefit is large for any cancer screening test, certainly compared with mammography for breast cancer or assay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA tests) for prostate cancer," he wrote.
The researchers analyzed data from more than 170,000 men and women from 1994 to 1999 at 14 health centers across Britain and then followed the patients' progress.
Most colorectal cancers start from adenomas, often symptomless growths that develop in 20 to 30 percent of the population. Two-thirds of colorectal cancers and adenomas are in the rectum and lower colon, which can be detected early by flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Among those who attended screening, rates of colorectal cancer were cut by 33 percent and death rates from the disease were cut by 43 percent, they said. This means one colorectal cancer death is prevented for every 489 people screened.
(Editing by Janet Lawrence)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Vitmai nD supplementation will prevent colon cancer from occuring 9and practically 80% of everything else too)
Maintain a natural, healthy level of at least 50 ng/ml (25 OH D) and avoid colon cancer.
Why is it that our brand of medicine only treats symptoms instead of causes?
We have to correct this fault at every level! Why are we not trying to avoid al lthis suffering instead of trying to make the suffering better?
For years medical expert recommendations have been for colonoscopy for anyone over age 50. With colonoscopy you have the ENTIRE colon examined, not just the lower part (the sigmoid).
Why would anyone settle for half an exam, when the medical experts in the GI tract recommend a full exam.
This article sends the wrong message, and I fear government health bureaucrats and health plan administrators will be all over this because it’s a “cheaper” test.
It’s cheaper only in the sense that you can buy a ticket from NYC to DC for less than a ticket to LA. It’s not the same thing, and you’re not getting the same value.
Bottom line: How many people who opt for sigmoidoscopy vs. colonoscopy will get colon cancer in the unexamined part of their colons. Tens of thousands!



Follow Reuters