Goldman's Tourre: Bank and I didn't mislead anyone

1 of 6. Fabrice Tourre, Executive Director, Structured Products Group Trading for Goldman Sachs, prepares to testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Investigations Subcommittee hearing on ''Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: The Role of Investment Banks'' on Capitol Hill, April 27, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK | Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:50am EDT

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc's Fabrice Tourre, the sole employee charged in a government fraud lawsuit against the firm, said he never hid material information, as the bank defended itself against charges that it profiteered from the housing crisis.

In prepared testimony before a Senate committee on Tuesday, Tourre vowed to defend himself against the Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit, and said he "categorically" denied the allegation that he failed to disclose material information about a product he was selling.

Senior Goldman officials combated charges from lawmakers that the investment bank profited from its clients misery as the housing market crumbled.

Goldman Sachs eked out only a small profit from residential mortgages in 2007, and lost money on them in 2008, Chief Financial Officer David Viniar said in prepared testimony to the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

Viniar emphasized that Goldman's mortgage profits in 2007 came not so much from prescience as risk management. The bank's residential mortgage positions were losing money daily in December 2006.

There was a vigorous internal debate about the future of the housing market that came to no firm conclusions, but Goldman decided to reduce its exposure given the risk in the market, Viniar said.

As Goldman reduced its exposure, it sold positions to investors that saw them as attractive.

"As with our own views, their views sometimes proved to be correct and sometimes incorrect," Viniar said.

The SEC sued Goldman and Tourre on April 16. It contended that Goldman failed to tell investors that it had allowed the hedge fund firm Paulson & Co to choose securities for a transaction known as ABACUS transaction that the fund believed would actually lose value.

Paulson & Co is believed to have made $1 billion from the transaction, roughly the same amount other investors lost. The firm and its principal, John Paulson, have not been charged.

In his testimony, Tourre said he never told ACA, the portfolio selection agent, that Paulson & Co would take an equity or long position in the Abacus transaction, and was "surprised" that ACA could have thought otherwise.

He also said the transaction "was not designed to fail," that Goldman had no economic motive for it to fail, and that he did not mislead ACA or the German bank IKB, two major investors in the transaction.

"While Paulson, Goldman Sachs and IKB all had input" into the portfolio, "ACA ultimately analyzed and approved every security in the deal," he said.

"When Goldman Sachs represented to investors that ACA selected the referenced securities, that statement was absolutely correct," Tourre added.

Other Goldman officials are also expected to testify before the Senate subcommittee today, including Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel and Dan Wilchins, editing by Dave Zimmerman and Tim Dobbyn)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
fred5407 wrote:
I guess the housing bubble never happened. I guess all these investors never lost anything. Then how about giving them all their money back.

Apr 27, 2010 10:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
luiscatan wrote:
Using the phrase “designed to fail” is not appropriate, since Goldman Sachs can effectively deny that they literallyans specifically designed an instrument WANTING it to fail. Not so. Goldman just wanted to create more and more of these monstrosities and get rid of its own trash assets, massaging the data to obtain AAA ratings, so as to earn huge sales commissions, NOT CARING that the underlying garbage assets would fail. Goldman could hide behind the assigned AAA ratings if it failed and, in the meantime, if it saw that the paper was indeed failing they could go the route of Paulson to gain even more money, i.e. shorting the instruments. Great deal!

Apr 27, 2010 10:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
HBC wrote:
Since IranContra-gate and the Clarence Thomas hearings it has become a tradition for grey-collar criminals to lie to the Senate. Through ones teeth.

Apr 27, 2010 1:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.