NASA may stretch out Mars missions to save money

WASHINGTON Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:48pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - NASA is considering a plan to get around limited budgets set in Washington by stretching out missions to bring back samples from Mars, a researcher said on Wednesday.

It may be possible to break down the complicated and expensive mission into three parts, said Steve Squyres, a Cornell University astronomer who leads the Mars Exploration Rover Mission.

"It makes the program more affordable because it strings out the cost over time," Squyres told reporters in a telephone briefing. "It brings down the cost per year of doing such a thing."

The U.S. space agency got an extra $6 billion in the latest federal budget, but President Barack Obama has said it is time to abandon the pricey Constellation program to return astronauts to the moon and focus instead on Mars and nearby asteroids and to use private contracts to support missions.

Squyres, speaking from a conference in Texas on the search for extraterrestrial life, said the new approach does not affect his team's work studying Mars using robots.

"All of us want to see humans on Mars collecting samples," he said. But the "details" of which rockets are used to launch such missions do not matter, he said.

He described a "hellish" mission in which a robot, similar to the successful Spirit and Opportunity rovers, scoops up a sample from the Martian surface. "The next mission would be a lander that would plop down beside it," Squyres said.

This vehicle could sling the sample into orbit around Mars, waiting for a third mission to retrieve it and bring it to Earth for study.

FOSSILS IN GYPSUM

And some other scientists at the meeting in Texas say they have better evidence that such a mission might find evidence of life, if there ever was any, on Mars.

For instance, in the vast fields of gypsum that cover much of the planet's surface may carry evidence, said Bill Schopf of the University of California, Los Angeles.

Schopf and colleagues said they found the remnants of plankton, diatoms and cyanobacteria in gypsum deposits made when the Mediterranean dried up 6 million years ago.

No one ever thought fossils could survive in gypsum, Schopf told the briefing. But if they lasted on Earth for millions of years, they could have lasted in the big fields of gypsum that strew what looks like a dried-up ocean on Mars.

"We now know that this is a good place to look for evidence of fossil life on Mars," Schopf said. "If we can find the organic matter then we have real reason to believe that there once was life there."

"These researchers are really shaping the strategy of the search for life in our solar system," said Mary Voytek, astrobiology senior scientist at NASA.

Separately on Wednesday, two teams of U.S. researchers reported they had spotted clear evidence of water on an asteroid.

Teams led by Andrew Rivkin of Johns Hopkins University in Maryland and Humberto Campins of the University of Central Florida found spectral evidence of what could be a thin layer of ice on 24 Themis, one of the largest objects in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

Voytek said the findings add to evidence that the water now on Earth was brought by collisions with asteroids. Scientists believe water recently found on the moon was also carried there by asteroids.

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Whittier5 wrote:
Abandoning the reachable goal of a Moon base NOW for very difficult goal of MAYBE reaching Mars SOMEDAY is Lunacy. A Mars expedition is so fraught with issues and time & timing requirements it really represents taking a long jump off of a short pier.

To say “been there, done that” to the Moon mission, as Obama and the NASA “Commission” have, is simply sophomoric. There probably aren’t 6 NASA scientists still working who participated in JFK & LBJ’s incredible achievement.

None of this is an “Expense”, until repeated Congresses and Admins started pretending to be “rocket scientists”, NASA always made tons of money for the US – that’s called “Profit”.

What NASA needs is a predictable Budget, then for Congress & White House to get out of the way. NASA’s scientists and engineers are way smarter than Congress, to be sure. And, in this instance, the White House.

Apr 29, 2010 10:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.