Rights groups to challenge Arizona immigration law

Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:43pm EDT

* Groups: law is unconstitutional, fosters racial profiling

* Furor spurs Democrats' reform efforts in Congress

* Obama warns no 'appetite' for issue before election

By Tim Gaynor

PHOENIX, April 29 (Reuters) - Civil rights groups prepared on Thursday to announce the first legal challenge to Arizona's new immigration law, which has put the issue back on the front burner of U.S. politics.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the National Immigration Law Center, which argue the law is unconstitutional, were expected to outline their legal strategy at the Arizona state capitol in Phoenix.

Arizona's Republican governor, Jan Brewer, signed the measure into law Friday, making it a state crime to be in Arizona illegally. It also requires state and local police to determine a person's immigration status if there is "reasonable suspicion" they are undocumented.

In a statement, MALDEF called the law "unconstitutional" and said it "encourages racial profiling, endangers public safety and betrays American values."

Republican backers say the law is needed to curb crime in the desert state, which is home to some 460,000 illegal immigrants and is a key corridor for drug and migrant smugglers from Mexico. This year, the U.S. Border Patrol's Tucson sector has made about 650 arrests a day.

While the measure has sparked an outcry among Latinos, civil rights activists and organized labor, some public opinion polls show broad support for the measure.

BROAD SUPPORT DESPITE FUROR

A Rasmussen Reports poll on Wednesday found that nearly two-thirds -- 64 percent -- of Arizona voters favored the statute. A telephone survey this week showed that 60 percent of voters nationwide backed such a law.

Earlier this week, President Barack Obama's administration said it was considering its own court challenge. The administration has said the law could inflame the immigration debate and divert resources from pursuing those in the country illegally who have committed more serious crimes.

Critics say the law violates the federal government's authority to control immigration.

The furor has revived the immigration debate ahead of November's mid-term congressional elections. And it has ratcheted up pressure on Obama to keep his campaign promise to Hispanics, a key Democratic constituency, to seek passage of comprehensive immigration reform early in his presidency.

Obama said on Wednesday there may not be an "appetite" in Congress to tackle the divisive issue in an election year.

Passing a bill offering a path to citizenship for many of the 10.8 million illegal immigrants in the United States would boost support for Democrats among Hispanics, the country's largest minority, but would run the risk of energizing Republican opposition to Democratic lawmakers in swing states and congressional districts.

The uproar could boost turnout at rallies across the country this weekend. It has spurred calls for economic boycotts of Arizona and its Major League Baseball team. (Additional reporting by David Schwartz; Editing by Steve Gorman and Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (29)
N0rtMan wrote:
I don’t see what the big deal is? In other advanced nations, Canada, Europe, Australia, immigratants are reqiuired to carry proof of Residency Status at all times. I thought liberals want the United States to become more like Europe?

Apr 29, 2010 2:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tij wrote:
Do people READ and UNDERSTAND the SB1070 word for word? It is a solid law. It is carefully crafted and a GENIUS law. A lot of things that opposing people talk about in this law is FALSE, HYPE, BASELESS, PROPAGANDA, SMEAR and a BUNCH OF LIES. The state of ARIZONA does NOT even have to enforce this law everyday and it will work. But I do not recommend that. However, it does need to be uniformly enforced meaning that if the crime is there, enforce it, don’t ignore it.

Read the intent of the law carefully. Arizona has no intention of deporting all illegal aliens. READ THE INTENT and discover what GENIUS of a law this is. I swear that Arizona will only have to probably do their everyday work like they are doing now like if the person committing a crime cannot provide a valid ID or DL, they check for immigration papers, this LAW will work like a charm. However, if they see violations stated in this bill, the law has to be enforced. This is the MOST GENIUS law I had ever seen.

Please read the SB1070 word for word. You will discover how genius of a law this is—- This law is a MASTERPIECE.

If the courts throw out this law, it will be the biggest mistake they will ever make. This law is working now and it has not been even enforced, yet. You really have to read the INTENT of this LAW – pure genius.

Apr 29, 2010 2:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fortressAZ wrote:
1. Bless the legal teams that will find this ‘law’ unconstitutional. (Violation of equal protection, illegal search and seizure, privacy, etc…)
2. ‘Broad support’ shows that even majorities can be wrong-headed and quick to look for a scapegoat for their problems.
3. The federal immigration system in our country is hopelessly broken and needs reforming now. (by the federal govt)
4. For the vast majority there is no legal line for unskilled laborers to get into…They are allowed in when the work needs to get done and they are kicked out when there is no work.
5. The Mexican people legal and otherwise have played a huge role in the building up of the infrastructure of the SW USA.
6. America used to be a beacon of liberty and welcoming and dignity. Or ideally it was. Here’s hoping we return. Remember where your ancestors came from?

Apr 29, 2010 2:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.