The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Apple may charge $1 million to display mobile ads: report

Related Topics

An advertisement for the Apple iPhone is shown at a retail store of an Orange mobile phone network provider in Bordeaux, southwestern France, October 23, 2009. REUTERS/Regis Duvignau

An advertisement for the Apple iPhone is shown at a retail store of an Orange mobile phone network provider in Bordeaux, southwestern France, October 23, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Regis Duvignau

Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:29am EDT

(Reuters) - Apple Inc may charge about $1 million for displaying advertisements on its mobile devices, the Wall Street Journal said, citing advertisement executives.

The rates may be even more to be among the first to advertise, the paper said.

Apple's new advertising platform for the iPhone and iPad -- dubbed iAd -- marks Apple's first foray into a small but growing market, and is sure to please the thousands of application developers who make their living off those devices, providing them with a new revenue stream.

The company indicated it could charge as much as $10 million to be part of a handful of marketers at the launch, the newspaper said, citing a person familiar with the matter.

Ad executives told the paper that they are used to paying between $100,000 and $200,000 for similar mobile deals.

As per the revenue sharing plan, application developers will receive 60 percent of the revenue, while Apple will get the other 40 percent.

Google Inc, which already sells advertising on smartphones, agreed to buy mobile ad firm AdMob late in 2009. U.S. regulators are examining the deal's antitrust implications.

Apple could not be reached immediately for comment by Reuters outside regular U.S. business hours.

(Reporting by Sakthi Prasad in Bangalore; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
$1 million smackers. What do they think, they are the next big thing since cable tv?

Apr 29, 2010 7:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
dwgtd wrote:
Good luck with that Apple. You guys are in a real downward spiral:

1) Badmouthing other web programming technologies

2) Changing your development policies and making enough developers mad enough for something like this to be created – http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=113492765344092

3) The whole Gizmodo fiasco

4) iPad failure (despite the misleading Press Releases where “delivered” is actually defined as iPads that have been shipped to Apple Stores and other distributors.

5) $1 million for ads. That’s hilarious. Thanks for helping other ad rates look better though!

Apr 29, 2010 8:36am EDT  --  Report as abuse
knut wrote:
What Apple fails, and Google fails, and Yahoo and Microsoft fail is on simple technology skills.

The Cerrier (Operator in Europe) owns the network. This is GSM technology at the roots, and it is very simple for them to route marketing just where the network owner wants. They can all spend $millions in various “technologies” – but at the end of the day, it will be the network owner that can determine every single advert.
Please Reuters: start using skilled reporters – I am fed up by reading hearsay and wishful dreams.

Apr 29, 2010 10:52am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.