Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Rosetta Stone suit vs Google dismissed

Related Topics

One of the business sites of Internet search engine Google Inc is shown on a computer screen in Encinitas, California April 13, 2010. REUTERS/Mike Blake

One of the business sites of Internet search engine Google Inc is shown on a computer screen in Encinitas, California April 13, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Blake

NEW YORK | Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:09pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Language software maker Rosetta Stone Inc's trademark infringement lawsuit against Google Inc has been dismissed by a federal judge.

Rosetta has vowed to keep pursuing the case which has broad implications for trademark ownership in the digital age.

In the suit filed in 2009, Rosetta claimed Google profits by allowing rivals that pirate its technology to buy the top "sponsored link" ad on search results pages.

Consumers who search for "Rosetta Stone" on the popular search engine and click on a "sponsored ad" may be visiting the website of a software pirate that purports to be Rosetta, but in reality sells a sub-standard product, the lawsuit claimed.

In a statement released Thursday, Google said the ruling was "consistent with a growing line of decisions" about the Internet.

"Users searching on Google benefit from being able to choose from a variety of competing advertisers, and we've found no evidence that legitimate use of trademarks as keyword triggers or in the text of advertisements confuses consumers," the Mountain View, California-based company said.

"It's not just about Rosetta Stone, frankly," Chief Executive Tom Adams told Reuters. "This is happening for lots and lots of other companies. We're willing to stick our neck out. Google is a very intimidating company."

The company is still awaiting the full ruling from Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Rosetta, based in Arlington, Virginia, said it had hoped for a full jury trial, and may appeal to a higher court.

The company claims Google "picks and chooses" to whom it sells sponsored ads.

A Reuters search late on Thursday afternoon showed no sponsored ads for Washington Post Co or American Airlines parent AMR Corp.

However, a sponsored ad for Rosetta Stone links to the website, www.studyingsoftmall.info, which claims to offer discounted Rosetta Stone products, though Rosetta is not affiliated with that website.

"Until you're subjected to this kind of piracy and sale of your trademark to the highest bidder, you don't really understand the case," Adams told Reuters.

Rosetta sells software to help users learn one of 31 languages, including Farsi, French and Irish.

The company is boosting its presence outside the United States, hoping to grow its international business from 11 percent of revenue to as much as 50 percent in the next four years.

Google, the world's most popular Internet search engine, makes most of its revenue from advertising. The company said earlier this month that first-quarter revenue rose 23 percent, largely due to a rebound in Internet advertising.

Shares of Rosetta fell 0.6 percent to close Thursday at $26.33. Google rose 0.5 percent to $532 on Nasdaq.

(Reporting by Ernest Scheyder; Additional reporting by Emily Chasan in New York and Alexei Oreskovic in San Francisco; Editing by Matthew Lewis and Richard Chang)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
avgprsn wrote:
It’s interesting how Rosetta lays claim to this “name”.
I wasn’t aware they taught hieroglyphs ;)

Apr 29, 2010 10:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
What is even more interesting is that you can’t bid on the word Google, they price it so high. (try it look to see if anyone is bidding on the keyword Google) or put Google in your description because it is a trademark. But you can put Rosetta Stone in your description quite easily. Another instance of Google saying “do as I say, not as I do” Also why is Google not listed as an adware company? They distribute their annoying toolbar with other people’s software automatically checked to be downloaded(ie. Adobe Flash) I thought that if you advertise another product through your software that is considered adware? Yeah it is. How come Google gets away with this? Also Google allows thousands of companies that have private registration to buy ads on their adwords product. Why would they allow that? Why would a legit company have a private registration? Google is a scammers paradise and they know it and don’t care because they don’t mind being evil as long as they makeare the ones raking in the dough. Why no investigative reporting into Google yet? What gives with that?

Apr 29, 2010 11:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.