U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Factbox: Possible environmental impact of Gulf oil spill

Related Topics

Related Video

Video

U.S. oil spill growing

Thu, Apr 29 2010

Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:18pm EDT

(Reuters) - A giant oil slick from last week's deadly offshore drilling rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico threatens wide-scale coastal damage for four states.

Following are some possible impacts from the spill on the Gulf environment, commercial fisheries, wildlife and tourism.

FISHERIES

- A number of fisheries could suffer as a result of the spill. The Gulf menhaden fishery -- a species harvested mostly for fish meal and fish oil -- is America's third largest and in some seasons its second largest, according to Greenpeace. Menhaden are filter feeders and so they could be badly affected by the spill, as they pass tainted water through their filtering system. The season for Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi just opened on April 19th.

Omega Protein Corp -- which relies on the fishery for its core business -- said in a statement on Wednesday that: "We believe that the impact, if any, on our Gulf of Mexico fishing operations will be minimal."

- The northern Gulf of Mexico is a crucial spawning ground at this time of the year for the Atlantic population of bluefin tuna, which is critically endangered. Their eggs float near the surface and the larvae also stay near there after they first hatch. So, the spill has occurred at a critical time in their life-cycle.

"We expect a spill like this could dramatically decrease the amount of bluefin tuna larvae that are surviving," said John Hocevar, the Oceans Campaign director for Greenpeace USA.

- Losses could also be inflicted on the shrimp and oyster industries in Louisiana. Oysters are filter feeders and cannot swim to escape the slick. The prime oyster-gathering season in Louisiana starts on May 1.

BIRDLIFE

- Several areas that are important to bird populations could be potentially affected.

According to the National Audubon Society, places it has designated as "Important Bird Areas" or IBAs that could be threatened by the slick include, Chandeleur Islands IBA and Gulf Islands National Seashore IBA in Louisiana and Mississippi; also in Louisiana, the Delta National Wildlife Refuge and Pass-a-Loutre Wildlife Management Area.

Species at risk include, Louisiana's state bird, the brown pelican, which was only removed from the U.S. Endangered Species Act last year. They nest on barrier islands and feed near shore. Their breeding season has just started.

Other species that would not fare well, especially if the slick comes ashore, include the American oystercatcher and Wilson's plover.

TOURISM

- Depending on where the slick goes, a number of beaches could be adversely impacted in areas such as the northwestern part of Florida, which has been running televised ads aimed at attracting tourists to the area.

OTHERS

- Several species of sea turtles are currently moving through the Gulf, as their spring nesting seasons commences and they need to surface to breathe, so the slick at the water's top could damage their populations.

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
endman wrote:
Where is the condemnation for the Obama response to this weeks ago. The tanker that sank will cause unimaginable ecological damage for years. This could have been contained sooner. The BBC was the first to report that our military was going to help in relief. Napolitano was asleep at the switch for as long as this has been going on just like Bush was before and after Katrina. Arizona was the only thing on the administrations mind and now the entire Gulf Coast will pay the price. Obama’s comment about needing a science teacher’s help and the thirty seconds devoted to the topic shows how much he is just like Bush. Incompetent. Should he still have his way then expect the new bill to open up drilling in the Gulf to go through. This guy is more out to lunch about the CARE for America then anybody.

Apr 29, 2010 3:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
GeorgeTruth wrote:
Look at the previous comment and see how the tea bagging right wing nuts want the government to bail out the mess an oil company caused. Who are the true socialists! Their whining is a good reason we should not allow offshore oil drilling because the right wing nuts want the government to solve the problem and blame it on the government and have the government come in and bail them out all the time. Just look at the mess they made with Wall Street. You can not trust the tea bagging wing nuts because they want their government welfare and it’s the taxpayers who need to cleanup the mess they helped cause by their “drill baby drill” crying!

Apr 29, 2010 4:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SAFETYMAN2 wrote:
This kind disaster must surly be expected and planned for. Its absolutely unbelievable that a full disaster plan for the safety of the sea and marine life as well as human life did not include a fully functioning way of capping/ closing the well in this kind of situation. One that would include a regular testing to insure it worked properly and was tested at regular intervals. It certainly should not include a valve that well be tested after a disaster has happened!!!!!

Apr 29, 2010 6:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.