Editor's Choice

Gulf state shrimpers sue BP over oil spill

Related Topics

HOUSTON | Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:02am EDT

HOUSTON (Reuters) - Shrimpers in Louisiana and Alabama have filed class-action lawsuits against oil giant BP Plc and owners of the drilling platform that exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, as claims for economic losses anticipated from the disaster began to mount.

Two similar lawsuits, filed late on Wednesday in U.S. District Court in New Orleans and on Thursday in the adjacent Gulf Coast state of Alabama, accuse the companies of negligence.

The huge oil slick was expected to reach a wildlife reserve at the mouth of the Mississippi River on Thursday as it menaced the environmentally sensitive coastline of four states.

The Gulf Coast region ranks as one of the most productive U.S. fisheries, especially for shrimp, accounting for more than 70 percent of a nationwide catch valued at $442 million in 2008, the last year for which federal figures were available.

The blowout comes at a particularly bad time for the shrimp industry, coinciding with the very start of the season as shrimp stocks make their way from estuaries out to sea.

"So they're moving directly into the path of the oil spill," said Deborah Long, spokeswoman for the Southern Shrimp Alliance trade group, which is not a party to the lawsuits.

The suits were filed on behalf of three commercial shrimp fishermen -- two in Louisiana and one in Alabama -- who are named in their respective complaints, and other coastal residents whose livelihoods are threatened by the spill.

The Coast Guard estimates that 5,000 barrels (210,000 gallons) of crude oil a day is gushing from the sea floor where the blowout occurred, and authorities have said it could take weeks to cap the leak as BP mounts what it calls the largest oil spill containment operation in history.

The suits name as defendants London-based BP Plc, which holds the lease to the offshore well; Swiss-based Transocean Ltd, owner of the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform that exploded in flames on April 20 and collapsed two days later; Halliburton Energy Services Inc, which was engaged in cementing operations of the well and well cap; and Cameron International Corp, which supplied the rig's blow-out prevention equipment that failed.

There was no immediate comment about the lawsuits from any of the companies.

The semi-submersible oil drilling rig burst into flames while finishing a well for BP about 40 miles southeast of the mouth of the Mississippi River.

Each of the lawsuits seeks economic and compensatory damages of at least $5 million, the minimum sum required by the federal Class Action Fairness Act on which jurisdiction for the suits are partially based. They also seek an unspecified amount of punitive damages.

"While we're still in the embryonic stages of quantifying the environmental impact, we're watching in real time, and somewhat helplessly, a slow-motion disaster," Louisiana-based lawyer Richard Arsenault, a partner in one of 10 law firms joining the Louisiana filing, said in an email.

The cases are Cooper and Anderson vs. BP, 2:10-cv-01229, and Mason vs. Transocean, 1:10-cv-00191-CG-B.

(Writing by Steve Gorman; editing by Mary Milliken and Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Stockaccume wrote:
Stock-Accumulator IMPORTANT POST: It will shortly be published that, as is always usual when renting any rig, the renter holds Transocean completely harmless from all liability, including all cleanup for a spill or envronmental disaster. BP or its insurers may even owe the Transocean insurers money for the rig itself. BP has when renting this rig, assumed all liability in various agreements. That is always the case. BP, not Transocean hired Haliburton, and paid for and took responsibility for maintenance of all equipment on the rig, including the emergency capping system. It is always in writing. The news will shortly be that BP bought the whole problem when they rented the rig for their own production, not Transocean. Cramer is in a lot of ways a wonderful guy, smart, entertaining. But his advice history, he recommended buying BP significantly before the accident, and was heavily promoting BP as his “PICK” for many weeks on his TV show and to his investors and followers. Now in trying to keep the BP stock price from falling further for his investors and followers (and his own sizeable investment) he, and others with a common cause in protecting their BP investments are publishing press releases on ultimately responsibility, with no fact basis. Stay away from BP. The government has already hinted multiple times, it is BP’s ultimate and clear responsibility. That will continue to be the fact published, and more so when Transocean lawyers shortly come to its defence in the press, showing the hold harmess agreements. Selling RIG now is an great error. Buying BP was a mistake one just has to live with. A bad way for Cramer to come to BP’s defense. We will see during May-July the published hold harmless agreements holding Transocean harmless. I am considering buying Transocean today. Last days perhaps to do this before Transocean comes to its defense and shows the clear hold harmess agreements to the news and public, which obviously exist. This is a very important post. STOCKACCUMULATOR

Apr 30, 2010 9:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.