Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

U.S. reviews diabetes, heart risk with prostate drugs

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Mon May 3, 2010 5:19pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is examining if certain hormone treatments for men with prostate cancer pose a greater risk of diabetes or heart problems than other therapies.

The FDA is looking at data from published studies to determine the risks with commonly used Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist drugs, the agency said on Monday.

The products include Abbott Laboratories' Lupron, AstraZeneca Plc's Zoladex, Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc's Trelstar, Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc's Vantas, Sanofi-Aventis SA's Eligard and Pfizer Inc's Synarel.

The agency said it has not made any conclusions about GnRH agonists, which suppress the production of testosterone, a hormone that helps fuel growth of prostate cancer.

Suppressing testosterone has been shown to shrink or slow the growth of prostate cancer. The treatment is known as androgen deprivation therapy.

However, the FDA noted that patients should be monitored for potential onset of diabetes or cardiovascular disease that can cause heart attacks, stroke and sudden cardiac death.

The FDA said six studies showed a small increased risk of diabetes or heart disease in patients treated with the drugs when compared with other prostate cancer therapies.

"However, these studies have design limitations that make it difficult to confirm a cause-and-effect relationship," an agency statement said.

The studies included limited information about drug exposure, varying definitions for heart disease, missing data on heart disease risk factors and other problems, the FDA said.

Patients should not stop taking the drugs unless a doctor tells them to, the FDA advised.

Some GnRH agonists also are prescribed at times to women and children to treat other conditions. The FDA said there were no known comparable studies that evaluated the risk of diabetes and heart disease in those groups.

Sanofi is evaluating cases of elevated insulin and blood clots "to determine whether labeling changes or other actions are required," company spokeswoman Emmy Tsui said.

The company "remains confident in the overall safety profile of Eligard based on clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance," company spokeswoman Emmy Tsui said.

Abbott spokeswoman Elizabeth Hoff said the prescribing instructions for Lupron list diabetes, increased glucose and cardiovascular events as potential problems.

Officials at Pfizer and AstraZeneca had no immediate comment. Other companies did not immediately respond.

In February, various doctors' groups wrote in the journal Circulation that they felt androgen deprivation treatment was likely to raise the risk of heart attack. They called for studies to determine the level of risk.

The FDA posted its notice on its website at link.reuters.com/kyv42k.

(Reporting by Lisa Richwine and Susan Heavey; Editing by Bernard Orr and Richard Chang)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Bloodyheck wrote:
I still find it amazing that in hardley anytime at all, they find a vaccine for prostrate cancer and male pattern baldness but STILL the only ‘cure’ for breast cancer is to lop them off.

May 03, 2010 1:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
USdoc wrote:
Lumpectomy was been proven to be as effective as mastectomy many years ago, though certainly modified radical mastectomy was considered the only treatment with a possibility of cure through most of the 20th century. There is also much more known about breast cancer compared to prostate cancer, and many more treatment options though as yet no vaccine treatment.

May 03, 2010 8:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
HealingNews wrote:
Hormone treatment simply means they cut out a vital body function, that would obviously lead to side effects that are often worse than a cancer. If left alone, I know people whose prostate cancers have disappeared, simply from following nutritional guidelines to reduce tumor growth. Not al tumors are dangerous or malignant, sometimes actually protecting our bodies. http://www.healingnews.com/heal_without_chemotherapy_05252009.html

May 04, 2010 1:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.