Drones kill low-level militants, few civilians: U.S.

WASHINGTON Mon May 3, 2010 4:20pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. estimates show CIA drone strikes in Pakistan's tribal areas over the last two years have killed more than 500 militants -- a fraction of whom are considered top-tier leaders -- and fewer than 30 civilians, officials said on Monday.

The number of so-called combatant and noncombatant casualties in the U.S. government tally is sharply lower than some Pakistani press accounts, which have estimated civilian deaths alone at more than 600.

Disclosing a partial tally of drone strikes since the summer of 2008, when the program was ramped up under then-President George W. Bush, could help the U.S. intelligence community counter protests from Pakistan and human rights groups about the civilian death toll.

But the numbers also show that the vast majority of the 500 killed -- more than 90 percent by some measure -- are lower-level fighters, raising questions about how much the CIA knows about each individual before they are killed, experts said.

Analysts said the truth about civilian casualties was difficult to ascertain because the region is largely inaccessible to outsiders and it is unclear what criteria the CIA uses to pick its targets and to determine who constitutes a combatant.

A U.S. counterterrorism official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the estimate was compiled using available intelligence as well as visual images -- presumably from the unmanned aerial drones which can circle overhead for hours after they strike to assess the damage.

There has been little independent verification of casualties in the tribal areas as reporters are generally not allowed to travel there except on occasional trips chaperoned by the Pakistani military.

Tallies by Reuters and other organizations suggest the death toll since mid-2008 was significantly higher than 500. A Reuters count showed nearly 850 people killed in at least 110 strikes since 2008.


Of those killed by the drones, roughly 14 are considered by experts to be top-tier leaders of al Qaeda, the Taliban or other militant groups, while another two dozen are deemed high-to-mid level leaders.

"Just because they're not big names doesn't mean they don't kill. They do," the U.S. counterterrorism official said. "Their facilities -- where they prepare, rest and ready weapons -- are legitimate targets, too."

The official said the CIA strikes were not "random" and are based on "information and observation, gathered over time."

Officials said U.S. civilian death toll estimates included some people who were traveling with or living with wanted militants, such as the second wife of the Pakistani Taliban's top leader. Both were killed in August by a CIA drone.

Analysts said accurately estimating civilian deaths was difficult, if not impossible, in these circumstances.

"It is unclear how you define who is a militant and who is a militant leader," Daniel Byman, a counterterrorism expert at the Brookings Institution's Saban Center for Middle East Policy, said, referring to those who associate with U.S. targets. "Do you count the driver? There are a lot of areas where people are what you might call 'half pregnant'."

(Reporting by Adam Entous; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
payne-adam wrote:
The US claims that drone attacks have killed nine of al-Qaeda’s 20 top commanders. No one is clear that if these commanders have been killed or not as not even in a single incident the images of those killed have been released. Even if we accept the doubtful analysis of US commanders about killing of nine al-Qaeda operatives, can the US justify the cold blooded murder of 12,995 civilians killed in missile attacks on Pakistan alone, in an attempt to kill nine insurgents?
It is interesting to note that Washington claims that its forces killed hundreds of Taliban terrorists in addition to nine al-Qaeda elements. The New American Foundation, in its report released few months back, claimed that in a total of 114 drone strikes in Pakistan carried out between 2004 and early 2010, approximately 834 to 1,216 persons had been killed, about two-thirds of whom were militants and one-third civilians.

Although the figure quoted are far less than the actual number of persons killed but if for a while we accept it on its face and link it with the Brookings Institution report that was released in July 2008, claiming that ten civilians perished in the attacks for every single militant killed, we can reach to some conclusion. The New American Foundation reflected that Pakistanis killed as a result of US attacks till January 2010 is 1,216 and its two-third is militants.

In other words 811 militants were killed during this period. Applying the Brookings Institution’s formula ie ten civilians for every single militant killed, the number of the civilian killed comes to 7,299 while total number of the persons killed in the attacks is 8,110.
Although, this figure is far than the actual killings caused by US drone and missile attacks but are sufficient to prove US involvement in state sponsored terrorism. Even if we consider the impossibility for a while that everything was in Islamabad’s knowledge, the US and its allies are still guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the light of Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

May 05, 2010 2:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.