U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Vaccine may trigger early start of infant epilepsy

Related Topics

HONG KONG | Tue May 4, 2010 6:33pm EDT

HONG KONG (Reuters) - Childhood vaccines may trigger early onset of a severe form of infant epilepsy, but researchers say the disorder is ultimately caused by defective genes and lifesaving vaccines should not be withheld from these children.

The researchers said they feared the study published in the Lancet medical journal would scare parents away from getting their children vaccinated but stressed the babies in the study would likely have developed seizures within months regardless of the vaccine.

The disorder, called Dravet syndrome, generally begins with seizures around six months of age. These children have poor language and motor skills and difficulty relating to others.

Up to 80 percent of them have mutations in the SCN1A gene.

Anne McIntosh of the University of Melbourne's Epilepsy Research Center and colleagues examined the medical records of 40 Dravet syndrome patients with the genetic mutation who had been vaccinated against whooping cough, or pertussis.

They said 30 percent of these children developed their first seizures within two days of receiving the vaccine but symptoms of their disorder were no worse than the other children who had their first seizures later on.

"In about 30 percent of people, it appears that (first seizures) came on rather quickly after the vaccination. But the overall message is that the outcome to the patients did not differ regardless of whether the onset of the disorder was shortly after the vaccination, or later on," said McIntosh.

"These kids already had that genetic abnormality, (so) regardless of the relationship with the vaccine, they would have actually had that disorder happen to them anyway," she added.

"Essentially, there is no proof that people should not be vaccinated ... from concerns about it causing the onset of that disease," she said in a telephone interview.

SENSITIVE ISSUE

Reports linking childhood vaccines to any sort of disorder are always sensitive because they can result in parents refusing to get their children vaccinated. This has caused a resurgence of dangerous diseases, including mumps, measles and whooping cough, in Britain, the United States and elsewhere.

In 1998 British doctor Andrew Wakefield published a study in The Lancet, suggesting the combined measles, mumps and rubella or MMR vaccine might be linked to autism and bowel disease.

The assertion has been widely discredited for years, the Lancet has withdrawn the paper and Britain's General Medical Council has ruled Wakefield acted dishonestly and irresponsibly.

But the damage has been done -- the number of MMR vaccinations in the United States and Europe plunged, prompting a resurgence of both measles and mumps.

This Australian study by McIntosh and colleagues follows an earlier investigation into whether the pertussis vaccine, which is routinely given to children together with diphtheria and typhoid vaccines (DTP), may have led to cases of encephalopathy.

The earlier investigation, led by Samuel Berkovic of the Epilepsy Research Center at the University of Melbourne, found that 12 of 14 patients with so-called vaccine encephalopathy were actually suffering from Dravet syndrome. Eleven of these 12 children were also found to have the SCN1A gene variant.

In an accompanying commentary, Max Wiznitzer from the Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio, said McIntosh's study was "consistent with the conclusion that outcome is determined by the underlying disorder and not by proximity to vaccine administration."

Wiznitzer, who was not involved in the study, said "effective and accurate information and communication" could help maintain public confidence in vaccines.

(Editing by Maggie Fox and Krittivas Mukherjee)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
bpatient wrote:
I think it’s clear that vaccination doesn’t “trigger” the start of epilepsy, but rather REVEALS the underlying genetic defect of severe monoclonic epilepsy of infancy (typically in the SCN1A gene encoding a neuronal sodium transport channel) which typically first manifests in association with a fever, whether that fever is associated with a vaccine or with any of the infections a child typically experiences.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16713920

If you were walking through a minefield, slipped on a banana peel, and fell on a landmine, it wasn’t the banana peel that did the damage: the problem was that you were walking in a minefield.

May 04, 2010 7:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Any medical professional who speaks out against the dangers of vaccines is immediately labeled as a kook. And why not? Think of all the billions of dollars the pharmaceutical industry would lose if people stopped vaccinating themselves and their children. We certainly can’t allow that to happen, can we?

May 04, 2010 10:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
whyohwhy28 wrote:
That some people are damaged by vaccines is not in dispute. The U.S. vaccine court has paid out billions in vaccine damages since it’s inception in the 1980’s. Why doesn’t the government study these people to learn what about them made them genetically vulnerable to vaccine damage? If we knew perhaps there is some way these people can be protected both from infectious disease and vaccine injury. This is 2010. We have decoded the genome. Let’s stop using 1920’s arguments as justification that some people need to be sacrificed. It doesn’t need to be like that. Every vaccine percentage disease has a percentage of the public that can remain unvaccinated and the disease will not come back, as those people are protected by the vaccinated herd – For Whopping Cough that number is as low as 6%, for Mumps it is as high as 25%, and most disease hover around 20%. So, once we understand genetic predisposition it is quite possible that those genetically vulnerable to vaccine injury can be protected while the rest of the public can be vaccinated…or perhaps their may be something that can be done medically to make the vulnerable less so to vaccine injury. All I know is that in 2010 we have a right to expect that the government should be working on this. It is not. It and the vaccine companies might as well come out and say what they really think, “we know some people are damaged by vaccines but we think it is worth it”.

May 04, 2010 10:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.