Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by tornado

A huge tornado tears through the Oklahoma City suburb of Moore, killing dozens.  Slideshow 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Study shows vitamin A doesn't cut maternal deaths

Related Topics

A mother kisses the hand of her newborn baby after his delivery in Lima, Peru in this May 3, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Mariana Bazo

A mother kisses the hand of her newborn baby after his delivery in Lima, Peru in this May 3, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Mariana Bazo

LONDON | Tue May 4, 2010 10:57am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Giving vitamin A to women aged between 15 and 45 in poor nations does not cut maternal death rates, scientists said Tuesday in a study which contradicts earlier research showing a dramatic drop in death rates.

Researchers working in Ghana on a trial involving almost 208,000 women found there was no difference in pregnancy-related death rates between those who were given vitamin A pills and those given placebos, or dummy pills.

Vitamin A deficiency is a public health problem in more than half of all countries, particularly in Africa and South-East Asia, hitting young children and pregnant women in low-income countries the hardest.

It is the leading cause of preventable blindness in children and can increase the risk of disease and death from severe infections, according to the World Health Organization.

But Betty Kirkwood, a nutrition and public health specialist at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who led the Ghana study, said her trial showed that giving vitamin A pills did nothing to cut maternal death rates.

"Our results suggest that vitamin A supplementation once a week in women of reproductive age has no beneficial effect on their survival or on the survival of their babies in rural Ghana," she wrote in the study published in The Lancet journal.

The trial results showed there were 39,601 pregnancies and 138 pregnancy-related deaths among those who took vitamin A supplements, and 39,234 pregnancies and 148 pregnancy-related deaths in the placebo group -- a difference that is not statistically significant.

Kirkwood noted that the Ghana findings contradicted previous results from a trial in Nepal which showed a 44 percent decrease in maternal death among women given vitamin A.

She said the discrepancy showed why it is wise not to rush to change maternal health policies on the basis on one piece of research.

"Research is as important to identify potentially good ideas that do not work, as it is in establishing those that do," she wrote. "This avoids governments wasting resources on ineffective interventions."

The Ghana study also found that giving vitamin A to women had no effect on the rate of stillbirths, or neonatal and infant survival -- results which echoed those of the Nepal trial.

(Reporting by Kate Kelland)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
MSchauss wrote:
What a poorly designed study. Giving vitamin A once a week and expecting anything but no response is a sign of poor research and review. This study should never have seen the light of day much less being published in a prestigious medical journal. Poor understanding of pharmokinetics on behalf of the researchers or they had an agenda to “prove” vitamin A did not help.

May 04, 2010 2:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Cwolf88 wrote:
Agree. In addition, supplementation research must dose to effective serum levels, not just dose at some blanket level.

May 04, 2010 3:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Cwolf88 wrote:
Malnutrition is a serious issue. Rickets, vit K deficiencies, etc. are widespread.

Various efforts to help are culture blind. Most of us have grown up and live in a multi-hundred year, multi-billion dollar infrastructure so we have great difficulty grasping the logistical, transportation, etc. issues and tend to come up with our industrial solutions. Just issue everybody a one-a-week vitamin. The true cost of that vitamin is what it takes to procure, ship, store, and distribute it. Which may exceed their annual income.

What is needed are sustainable 17th-18th century solutions that are effective in that climate, terrain, and culture. Look at what the Gates Foundation is doing. Major disease issues. Solution: bed netting, trench latrines, etc.

For the long-haul, Gates ought to develop a model of what an agrarian village needs to be healthy, sustain itself, etc. How can they use local crops and materials to grow a nutritious, balanced diet and then store/transport food, etc?

http://www.foodplantsinternational.com/

May 05, 2010 9:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.