Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Women in U.S. having children later, better educated

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Thu May 6, 2010 1:15pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Life!) - Women in the United States are having children later, fewer of them are married and the percentage of teenage mothers of newborns has dropped since 20 years ago, according to a new report.

In 1990 only nine percent of births were to women 35 years and older and 13 percent were to adolescents, but the numbers had shifted by 2008 when 10 percent of births were to teens and 14 percent were to older women.

"The demography of motherhood in the United States has shifted strikingly in the past two decades," the Pew Research Center said in the report.

"Another notable change during this period was the rise in births to unmarried women ... a record 41 percent of births in the United States were to unmarried women, up from 28 percent in 1990," it added.

The share of births to unmarried mothers has increased most among white and Hispanic women.

Mothers are also better educated than they were two decades ago. In 2006 more than half of mothers of newborns had some college education, an increase from 41 percent in 1990.

The percentage was even higher among mothers 35 years and older with 71 percent.

"The higher share of college-educated mothers stems both from their rising birth rates and from women's increasing educational attainment," the report explained.

Attitudes have also altered in the past 20 years as the stigma of unmarried parenthood has softened and Americans have married later in life.

But two is still the ideal number of children in a family for many Americans, which hasn't changed since the 1970s and many couples cited "the joy of having children" as the reason for starting a family.

"However, a half century after the Food and Drug Administration approved the sale of birth control pills, nearly half of parents said 'there wasn't a reason; it just happened."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
Frankel wrote:
I’m 31 and can’t imagine having kids for at least another 10 years. If you’re a woman trying to make it on her own and you don’t have a partner who’s making a lot of money, you have no choice but to put off motherhood. In order to afford children it takes the incomes of two educated, motivated career-oriented professionals. It is difficult for working-class people to have children without being forced to live in poverty so you have to spend years and years getting educated. It’s ridiculous and not at all indicative of “freedom”. I support public policy that makes parenthood affordable: subsidized daycare, housing, health-care and transportation. I support a Scandinavian model. Americans should be encouraged to have children, if they so choose.

May 06, 2010 2:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Todd_Drum wrote:
Waiting till you can afford having children? Needing subsidized child care? Needing a support system like the Scandinavian system? Hmmm, it has always taken a two parent income and effort to properly raise a family and now we don’t want responsibility of life time commitments. Hence a 41% birth rate out of wedlock. Marriage I such a burden for people. Why should any child be raised in a loving two parent (Mom and dad) life style, when we can always pursue our own selfish life’s desires and not let children get in the way. They are such a pain the rear. Lets create institutions where the government can raise them like animals and have the government pay for all the expenses! Yes, then we will truly be unburden by these little devils that need so much of our time.
BTW, I am a happily married man (18yrs married) with 3 children. Yes, they are expensive and need all of our time and efforts. But they are so worth it. If you don’t understand such basic love and commitments, truly you are lost in your own little selfish world.

May 06, 2010 3:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JustMeNow wrote:
Ohbveeouslee you are not one of them with your proper grammer and excellent spelling.

May 06, 2010 3:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.