A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Republicans want to lift bank swaps ban: senator

WASHINGTON | Thu May 6, 2010 4:14pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Banks would be allowed to keep their lucrative swaps-trading desks under a softened set of regulations for the $450 trillion derivatives market proposed by U.S. Senate Republicans on Wednesday.

The proposal could lead to a bruising Senate floor fight as Democrats try to advance a crackdown on the $450 trillion derivatives market as part of a sweeping rewrite of Wall Street regulations.

"It's something we've been working on as Republicans, and there's pretty general agreement on our side," Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss, one of the amendment's authors, told Reuters.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and Senator Richard Shelby, the lead Republican negotiator on the larger bill, are among the 12 lawmakers who have signed on as co-sponsors.

No Democrats have yet signaled support, Chambliss said. Republicans control 41 seats in Senate, far short of the 60 votes that will likely be needed to modify the financial regulation bill.

A swap is a financial contract in which two parties exchange cash flows on debt, currencies, or other assets, usually to hedge risks; the market is dominated by interest rate swaps which were invented in the 1980s.

Credit default swaps, used to protect against the risk of debt default, have been blamed for amplifying concerns about corporate and sovereign credit quality.

Banks, which reap huge profits from swaps, have attacked the proposal. Banking regulators have expressed concerns about its impact on government oversight and bank capital.

The White House is uneasy with the swap desk provision, but has not directly addressed it.

"Quietly, we hear they are moving around opposing it, and that's directly from people who are in the room when they meet on these things," said a source with knowledge of the talks.

Three sources said the administration is reluctant to appear to oppose something with populist appeal.

Analysts say the measure probably will be dropped from the bill as the Senate debates amendments over the next two weeks.

BANKS COULD SPIN OFF DESKS INTO AFFILIATES

Senator Blanche Lincoln, who drafted the Democratic derivatives proposal, said it was "absolutely false" that it would push swaps trading beyond the reach of regulators.

"Every swaps dealer and major swap participant will be subject to strong regulation," she said.

As currently written, the Democratic-backed bill would effectively require banks to spin off their swaps desks.

The provision does not detail how banks would need to spin off swaps operations, but Lincoln, citing comments on her bill by economist Joseph Stiglitz, said on Wednesday banks could write derivatives through an affiliate.

"We haven't talked explicitly about the mechanics of the bill, but today she clarified that it can be spun off into an affiliate," Lincoln's spokeswoman Courtney Rowe said, noting the distinction may ease some fears about the provision.

Morgan Stanley operates its swap desk through an affiliate, Rowe noted.

REPUBLICAN PLAN HAS BROADER EXEMPTIONS

The 218-page Republican amendment differs from the Democratic bill by exempting more end users from requirements to send trades through clearinghouses.

It would let regulators decide which derivatives would need to pass through clearinghouses, and would not require clearing for foreign exchange swaps, forwards and options unless the Treasury department determines it is required.

Under the Republican proposal, swaps would be reported to regulators and prices and volumes would be reported to the public. Unlike the Democratic bill, it would not mandate exchange trading for swaps.

(Additional reporting by Charles Abbott, Christopher Doering and Rachelle Younglai; Editing by Andrew Hay and Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
ejr1953 wrote:
The trading of derivatives without reserve requirements is the real root of the problem, not where they are traded. This proposal really doesn’t prevent a re-occurance of 2008.

May 06, 2010 8:00am EDT  --  Report as abuse
stan0301 wrote:
So, after experiencing the worst economic melt down since 1929 the Republicans want to keep right on doing the same stuff that caused it–in truth today’s Republicans want to steal every nickel that isn’t nailed down–to what unimaginable depths has the party of Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt sunk. We need a new breed of Republican–one that puts their nation in front of using government to create opportunities to harvest their fellow citizens like a wheat crop.

May 06, 2010 8:05am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Marullus wrote:
Republicans want to weaken any bill that has real regulatory teeth. Let’s see do we trust corporations (kneeling at the god of profit above all else) to regulate themselves? BP – self regulated redundant safety mechanisms (not); AIG – self regulated their insurance business leading to wild risk taking with other people’s money; Johnson & Johnson – self regulated their quality and safety program to protect the lives of our children allowing more profits at the expense of the well being of our children; Massey Energy – 29 miners dead – enough said; Goldman Sachs, Enron, Exxon, the list goes on and one. The great Republican president Teddy Roosevelt led the charge against corporate power. Without the leadership of people (who believe in a different God than the ‘profit’ god that corporations follow), we would not have child protections, unemployment insurance. social security, medicare, etc. It isn’t the labor unions that are hiring illegal aliens. It isn’t the labor unions that are sending American jobs offshore for cheaper labor.

May 07, 2010 8:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.