Read
- Magnitude 5.7 quake strikes Northern California: U.S. Geological Survey
- Bridge collapses in Washington state, sending cars into river
- Large U.S. retailers sue Visa, MasterCard over card fees
- British police ponder conspiracy after soldier murder
|
- Analysis: Markets face rough summer ride as Fed pullback feared
Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more
Sponsored Links
Lose weight fast to get lasting results: study
NEW YORK |
NEW YORK (Reuters Life!) - Want to lose weight and keep it off? The best way to do it is to drop the pounds quickly, not slowly, according to new research.
Scientists at the University of Florida, who studied the link between the rate of initial weight loss and overall success long-term, said shedding weight quickly is the best way to achieve lasting results.
"Women who lost at a faster rate, greater than 1.5 pounds a week, had lost more and maintained a greater loss in the long run than women who lost at a slower rate of half a pound a week or less," said researcher Lisa Nackers, whose findings are published online by the International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.
The women who lost weight faster also kept better food records and ate fewer calories than the other women.
"It shows if you get off to a quick start ... it pays off more in the long run than making smaller behavioral changes," Nackers added in an interview.
About two-thirds of U.S. adults and nearly one in three children are overweight or obese. Research results have been mixed on whether dropping pounds at a slow or quicker pace is best for overall weight loss in the long term.
Nackers said the jury is still out on which is the best method but her findings support the quick approach.
"What we concluded in this study is that the results show that perhaps losing at a faster rate is more reinforcing in terms of the learning period of behavior," she added.
Nackers suggests that physical appearance, body image, increased energy and better mobility may be improved more by shedding weight quickly which can be encouraging to meet goals.
She and her team studied data on 262 middle-aged women who took part in an obesity treatment trial. All the women were encouraged to cut calories and do more exercise.
They split the women into three groups, fast, moderate and slow, according to how much weight they lost in the first month. They also studied how much weight the women had dropped at six and 18 months.
Nackers reported that women in the fast group were five times more likely to achieve a 10 percent loss of their body weight at 18 months than those in the slow group. Women in the moderate group were nearly three times more likely to reach that milestone than the slow group.
(Editing by Steve Addison)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Doesn’t that prove that the women in the slow weight loss groups had more trouble losing weight to begin with (for physical, mental or emotional reasons), making it very logical that after 12 or 18 months their results weren’t too good?
Meijke van Herwijnen, MSc Nutrition & Health
“They split the women into three groups, fast, moderate and slow, according to how much weight they lost in the first month.” (Italics mine)
From the sound of it, and I havent’ looked up the whole manuscript yet, (Maybe tomorrow, it’s late) This isn’t a controlled study where they tested different groups of women who were assigned to lose weight slowly or more quickly. All the women got the same counseling. They simply observed women who lost weight at different paces at the outset got different resuts.
This does NOT lead ME to the conclusion that rapid weight loss is any better, (and there is a large bulk of evidence to the contrary, that the more slowly wieght loss is achieved, the more permanent it is likely to be).
It rather would lead me to conclude that women who lose weight faster in the initial stages of a weight loss program are predicted to be those that lose the most and keep it off.
Is that really surprising, though? If someone is succeeding at the beginning of a program versus someone who’s not really losing much, wouldn’t anyone expect the first group to be more successful in the end?
I suspect is simply reflects the people who “bought in” more to the programs guidelines, who were more compliant, motivated, etc.
Would love to hear others thoughts on this.
Georgie Fear RD
www.AskGeorgie.com
Follow Reuters