Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Obama has harsh words over corporate campaign money

Related Topics

U.S. President Barack Obama and his nominee for Supreme Court Justice, Solicitor General Elena Kagan, appear in the East Room at the White House in Washington May 10, 2010. Kagan is Obama's choice to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Barack Obama and his nominee for Supreme Court Justice, Solicitor General Elena Kagan, appear in the East Room at the White House in Washington May 10, 2010. Kagan is Obama's choice to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON | Mon May 10, 2010 11:12am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama blasted "unscrupulous corporations" and "special interests" that seek to influence U.S. elections on Monday as he nominated Solicitor General Elena Kagan for the U.S. Supreme Court.

Obama noted that Kagan had represented the U.S. government before the court in the "Citizens United" case, in which the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in January to allow corporations, unions and other groups to spend unlimited funds on political campaigns.

"During her time in this office, she has repeatedly defended the rights of shareholders and ordinary citizens against unscrupulous corporations," Obama said as he officially announced that Kagan would be the nominee.

"In the Citizens United case, she defended bipartisan campaign finance reform against special interests seeking to spend unlimited money to influence our elections," Obama said.

The ruling is expected to unleash a flood of money from the traditional pro-Republican business community to campaigns designed to favor or oppose candidates in this year's congressional elections and the 2012 presidential contest.

Obama took the unusual step of criticizing the ruling in his State of the Union speech in January.

The president praised Kagan for making the case the first she argued before the court, calling that a demonstration of Kagan's commitment to serving the public interest.

"It says a great deal about her commitment to protect our fundamental rights, because in a democracy, powerful interests must not be allowed to drown out the voice of ordinary citizens," Obama said.

(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle, editing by Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
5280hi wrote:
No matter who Obama nominates, the balance of this court is controlled by activist Republican judges, influenced by politics and Plutocrats in the oil and gas industry, agribusiness, health insurers, Wall Street, and most importantly by Big Media outlets FOX and CNN. They don’t care about the citizenry, only the corporations.

May 10, 2010 2:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.