Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

House panel blames rig device in BP oil spill

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed May 12, 2010 1:48pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The device designed to cut the oil flow after BP's oil rig exploded was faulty, the head of a congressional committee said on Wednesday as executives in the unfolding Gulf of Mexico disaster were lambasted over shoddy practices in the second day of hearings.

The chairman of a House of Representatives subcommittee said on Wednesday its investigators uncovered significant problems with the blowout preventer device, including the failure of several emergency backup switches to stop the flow.

Representative Bart Stupak, head of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, said the rig's underwater blowout preventer had a leak in its hydraulic system and the device was not powerful enough to cut through joints to seal the drill pipe.

He said the panel's investigators also discovered the blowout preventer on the Deepwater Horizon rig had been modified, which made it difficult to operate after the accident.

Stupak also said the device's emergency backup controls may have failed because the explosion that destroyed the rig also disabled communications, preventing workers from sending signals to the underwater device.

"The safety of its entire operations rested on the performance of a leaking and apparently defective blowout preventer," Stupak said.

Top executives from the companies involved in Gulf of Mexico disaster returned to Capitol Hill on Wednesday for the second day of hearings after marathon sessions yesterday.

Representative Joe Barton, the top Republican on the subcommittee's full Energy and Commerce Committee, urged lawmakers not to restrict offshore drilling but still blasted the companies involved in the accident.

"We've had an accident. It is not an act of God," Barton said. "It is something that could have been and should have been contained. The facts that we've uncovered ... show that there was in all probability shoddy maintenance."

BP American President Lamar McKay told lawmakers that blowout preventers are intended to be fail-safe.

BP officials had told panel investigators that the modifications to the blowout preventer were so extensive that drawings provided by Transocean of the device after the accident no longer matched the structure on the ocean floor.

At a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Transocean's president, Steven Newman, said the modifications to the blowout preventer were made in 2005 at BP's request.

Jack Moore, the president of Cameron International Corp. that built the blowout preventer in question in 2001, told the House panel that it was "far too early" to draw conclusions on what caused the accident. He said the company has not been able to the examine the blowout preventer.

Lawmakers also criticized BP's lack of planning to deal with an oil spill in the Gulf's deep waters.

"BP is largely making it up as they go," Representative Ed Markey said. "They are engaging in a series of elaborate and risky science experiments."

Markey joked about BP's proposal to stuff the blowout preventer with golf balls, oil tires "and other junk" to block the spewing oil.

"When we heard the best minds were on the case, we expected MIT, not the PGA," said Markey, referring to the professional golfing group. "We already have one hole in the ground and now their solution is to shoot a hole in one?"

(Reporting by Tom Doggett; additional reporting by Ayesha Rascoe; Editing by Russell Blinch and Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
5280hi wrote:
This link to the website of the American Ass’n of Drilling Engineers contains a Powerpoint presentation by Halliburton showing parameters to be considered when cementing wells in deep water. At the depth of this well, procedure done this fast (due to high rig cost), could it have created enough heat to destabilize the frozen methane gas in the seafloor to cause release of gas and subsequent explosion?

http://www.aade.org/houston/study/Fluids/11182009/F%20Tahmourpour%20Deepwater%20Cementing.pdf

May 12, 2010 2:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bgreen2224 wrote:
Stupak says….Well, maybe it’d be a good idea to see just what companies (like Haliburton, maybe) have contributed to his ‘re-election campaign’ and which ones do so in the future.

May 12, 2010 2:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ChazzMann99 wrote:
Part of the blame lies with those of us driving cars and trucks. If everyone drove a vehicle that got twice the mileage they do now, we would cut our consumption in half.

Oil companies make hundreds of billions in profits, spending as little as possible on safety.

May 12, 2010 3:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.