Wal-Mart in $86 million settlement of wage lawsuit

NEW YORK Wed May 12, 2010 11:00am EDT

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wal-Mart Stores Inc agreed to pay as much as $86 million to settle a class-action lawsuit accusing it of failing to pay vacation, overtime and other wages to thousands of former workers in California.

About 232,000 people will share in the settlement, which was disclosed on Tuesday in a federal court filing.

It requires a minimum payout of $43 million, and "far exceeds other recent settlements" involving Wal-Mart, the filing shows. The accord requires court approval.

Wal-Mart spokesman Greg Rossiter declined to comment.

The world's largest retailer was accused in the original 2006 complaint of failing to pay a variety of wages to former workers as required under California law.

In agreeing to settle, the Bentonville, Arkansas-based company did not concede that any wages remained unpaid, according to Tuesday's filing.

The settlement is separate from Wal-Mart's 2008 agreement to pay as much as $640 million to settle 63 federal and state class-action lawsuits alleging it deprived workers of wages.

Last December, Wal-Mart also agreed to pay $40 million to settle a class-action lawsuit over wages in Massachusetts.

The $86 million equals roughly two days of after-tax operating profit for Wal-Mart, regulatory filings show.

Wal-Mart shares were up 6 cents to $52.22 in morning trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

The case is In re: Wal-Mart Stores Inc Wage and Hour Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 06-02069.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel; Additional reporting by Brad Dorfman in Chicago, editing by Dave Zimmerman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
DocTgo5 wrote:
…sigh…
Are the pennies saved at WalMart worth killing the middle class? Corporate greed wins again while local businesses and underpaid, disadvantaged employees pay the price. …sigh….

May 12, 2010 11:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Pilot wrote:
Isn’t it exciting how Walmart can be legally extorted to pay monies? I hope the rich communist labor organizations choke on the money they steal.

May 12, 2010 11:05am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Brenna47 wrote:
Many of us do not like or approve of Walmart’s mistreatment of their employees among other practices; however, I don’t want to see another group of people without a job if we stop shopping at Walmart. I’d like to know what the workers want us to do. If they want us to protest by not shopping there, I would honor that. In this bad economic time, I feel best doing what the victims would like us to do.

May 12, 2010 11:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus