Rogue general wounded, 1 killed in Bangkok fighting

BANGKOK Thu May 13, 2010 4:37pm EDT

1 of 10. Major General Khattiya Sawasdipol is carried to an ambulance after being shot in the head behind the barricades at a fortified camp in Bangkok's shopping district May 13, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Steve Pace

Related Video

Related Topics

BANGKOK (Reuters) - A rogue Thai general leading a militant wing of anti-government protesters was shot in the head and critically wounded on Thursday, and a man was killed when the army used force to blockade a five-week street rally.

Khattiya Sawasdipol, a suspended army specialist in charge of security for thousands of demonstrators, was shot by an apparent sniper's bullet to the temple and rushed to hospital, the state Narenthorn Emergency Medical Service said.

The shootings sparked half a dozen confrontations between rock-throwing protesters and armed security forces on the outskirts of the 3 sq-km (1.2 sq-mile) commercial district where red-shirted protesters have barricaded themselves since April 3.

One protester was shot in the eye and died after a group of red shirts confronted soldiers armed with assault rifles next to a park in the Silom business district, witnesses said. Some protesters hurled rocks and troops fired in return.

Gun fire, explosions and sporadic fighting continued into the night around army checkpoints near the protesters' encampment, protected by medieval-like walls made from tyres and wooden staves soaked in kerosene and topped by razor wire.

By 2:30 a.m. (10:30 p.m. EDT), nine people were wounded, according to the Erawan Medical Center. The military brought in armored vehicles, shut down power in some areas at the protest site and cut some mobile phone services.

Khattiya, better known as "Seh Daeng" (Commander Red), was dubbed a "terrorist" by Thailand's government, which accuses him of involvement in dozens of grenade attacks that have wounded more than 100 people.

But in recent days he was equally critical of other red shirt leaders, accusing them of embracing Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva's proposed "national reconciliation" which unraveled this week after protesters refused to leave the streets.

Several Thai and foreign reporters said Khattiya was shot as they interviewed him. He was answering a question about whether the Thai military would be able to penetrate the area.

It is unclear who shot him, though some security analysts suggested the army may have played a role. "It's a clear attempt to decapitate the red shirt military leadership," said Anthony Davis, a security consultant with IHS-Jane's.

"It's a smart tactical move that will cause confusion in the red shirts' military ranks and send a message to the leadership that if they don't want to negotiate and come out, they can expect extreme consequences."

PRIME MINISTER UNDER PRESSURE

The shooting of Khattiya and the security cordon around the red shirt encampment mark the start of a violent crackdown in which the Thai government stands a good chance of clearing the streets, the Eurasia Group political risk consultancy said.

"But it will not end the polarization that has led to the current instability -- ensuring that the pressure from the red shirts will persist and that political volatility will remain a persistent problem for Thailand for the foreseeable future."

Around the time of the shooting, a loud blast was heard, followed by bursts of automatic gunfire near the business district. Hours later, troops at a nearby park fired into the air as protesters tried to block their movement.

Abhisit is under enormous pressure to end the protests, which began with festive rallies on March 12 and descended into the deadliest political violence in 18 years in which 30 people have been killed and more than 1,400 wounded.

The crisis has paralyzed parts of the capital, decimated tourism, pushed away foreign portfolio investors and slowed growth in Southeast Asia's second-biggest economy.

Foreign investors have sold $584 million in Thai shares in the past six sessions, cutting their net buying so far this year to $607.6 million in an emerging market seen at the start of the year as one of Asia's most promising.

On Wednesday, Abhisit canceled a proposed November 14 election and called off talks with the protesters, who broadly back former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, who was ousted in a 2006 coup and convicted of graft. He lives in self-exile, mostly in Dubai.

The 22-member red shirt leadership council has struggled to find consensus and appeared in disarray on Thursday night. Its chairman and several others have not been seen in days.

Former Prime Minister Chavalit Yongchaiyudh, chairman of the protesters' parliamentary wing, the Puea Thai Party, called on the demonstrators to leave the upscale shopping district where about 20,000 had gathered earlier in the day.

Some hardliners such as Khattiya advocated stepping up the protests to win the fight once and for all. Many face criminal charges for defying an emergency decree and some, like Khattiya, face terrorism charges carrying a maximum penalty of death.

The protesters said this week they would only disperse if a deputy prime minister faces criminal charges over a deadly April 10 clash between troops and protesters.

The Cabinet on Thursday approved a state of emergency in 17 northern and northeastern provinces, which are red shirt strongholds, to prevent potential unrest.

Companies and embassies across the area, including the U.S. embassy, closed and activated back-up plans for Friday. Public transportation was diverted from the area.

Protest leaders pleaded over their radio station for people to come and reinforce the encampment and threatened to lay siege to Abhisit's house and an infantry barracks where he has taken refuge if there was a crackdown.

(Additional reporting by Chalathip Thirasoonthrakul and Jerry Lampen; Writing by Bill Tarrant and Jason Szep)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
Vichai_N wrote:
Whatever their original objective(s) was/were when the Reds occupied Bangkok’s Rajaprasong district area, the Reds leadership forgot all that and lost their opportunity to be counted in Thai history.

The PM Abhisit government gave the Reds leadership every opportunity for a peaceful resolution to their grievance/demands. PM Abhisit gave them a definite Nov. 14th election date, PM Abhisit gave them a 5-point reconciliation road map which the Reds earlier embraced but later on discarded. Former CRES Chief Suthep surrendered to the police as demanded by the Reds . . . but all came to naught as the Reds leadership just kept on coming up with more new demands each day.

A military crackdown now looks imminent. And if the Reds leadership all along was looking forward for a martyrdom for thousands of their bewildered followers, then that outcome was thus inevitable.

May 13, 2010 4:10am EDT  --  Report as abuse
beancube2101 wrote:
If protesters turn terrorists underground after the military attack, Thai and its neighbors’ economy will slip into a new crisis. With that kind of number showing up in protest, UN should demand the president to resign, dissolve his administration, and the protester must retreat and accept the announcement of referendum and election for all voters to decide who they are going to vote for.

May 13, 2010 5:52am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Marullus wrote:
Whatever their original objective(s) was/were the unelected government forgot all that and lost its opportunity to be counted in Thai history.

The Red Shirt leadership gave the unelected government every opportunity for a peaceful resolution to their grievance/demands. The Red Shirt Leadership offered concessions to the unelected government even after it struck at the Thai citizens killing a number of them. Now the unelected government has rescinded all that it had agreed to and is again threatening force against citizens of Thailand. Why is the unelected government afraid of elections which should be held if Thailand is to be a democracy?

A military crackdown now looks imminent. And if the unelected government all along was looking forward to killing Thai citizens to hold on to the power they illegally siezed, then that outcome was thus inevitable.

May 13, 2010 10:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus