Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

"Savagely beaten" Stanford asks to be freed

Related Topics

Texas billionaire Allen Stanford arrives at the Federal courthouse in Houston, in the custody of U.S. marshalls, June 25, 2009. REUTERS/ Steve Campbell

Texas billionaire Allen Stanford arrives at the Federal courthouse in Houston, in the custody of U.S. marshalls, June 25, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/ Steve Campbell

NEW YORK | Tue May 18, 2010 4:31pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Allen Stanford, the Texas financier charged with running a $7 billion Ponzi scheme, asked the federal judge overseeing his case to release him pending the start of his criminal trial, saying that his detention violated his constitutional rights.

Stanford has also fired one of his lawyers, setting up a potential showdown with U.S. District Judge David Hittner, who said last month he would not allow a fifth change to the defense team.

In a filing on Tuesday with the federal court in Houston, lawyers for Stanford said their client had been "subjected to substantial and undeniable punishment," including nearly a year of incarceration and both physical and psychological damage.

This and the prospect of more than a year of further custody until and during his trial, which is scheduled to start in January 2011, violates his constitutional rights to due process, effective assistance of counsel, a speedy trial, and an absence of excessive bail, the lawyers said.

"When Mr. Stanford surrendered to authorities, he was a healthy 59-year-old man," Stanford's Houston-based lawyer, Robert Bennett, wrote in a brief on which Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz consulted.

"Mr. Stanford's pretrial incarceration has reduced him to a wreck of a man: he has suffered potentially life-impairing illnesses; he has been so savagely beaten that he has lost all feeling in the right side of his face and has lost near-field vision in his right eye," Bennett said.

Saying their client had neither the motive to flee nor the means, having been declared "indigent" by court, Stanford's lawyers urged that he be placed under house arrest at the home of his fiancee's sister, with an ankle bracelet and other travel restrictions.

The office of U.S. Attorney Jose Angel Moreno in Houston did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

A federal appeals court has twice rejected Stanford's attempts to be freed from jail pending trial, and Hittner has called Stanford a flight risk.

Stanford has been held in a Texas jail since his June 2009 arrest. In a 21-count indictment, prosecutors accused him of selling fraudulent certificates of deposit issued by his bank in Antigua.

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES

Separately, one of Stanford's lawyers, Michael Essmyer, has asked the court for permission to withdraw from the case.

Essmyer, the managing partner at Essmyer, Tritico & Rainey LLP, cited Stanford's decision to fire him on May 14, and "irreconcilable differences" with Bennett over litigation strategy and other matters.

"The nature of the irreconcilable differences is also the fact that Mr. Bennett acts independently without lead counsel's knowledge or consent, and often in a manner that, in lead counsel's opinion, is detrimental to the best interests of the client," Essmyer wrote. He said he and his law firm "do not want to be held responsible for the actions of Mr. Bennett."

Essmyer declined to make additional comments. Bennett did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

At a hearing on April 6, Hittner raised his voice several times as Stanford refused to directly answer questions about his legal representation. The judge nonetheless agreed to let Stanford to replace his latest two lead lawyers.

"You've had 10 attorneys attempt to enter this case on your behalf," Hittner said. "I will not entertain any further substitutions."

A case manager for Hittner said the judge would consider Essmyer's request at a hearing to be scheduled.

The case is U.S. v. Stanford, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, No 09-cr-00342.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel; Additional reporting by Anna Driver in Houston; Editing by Ted Kerr)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
ZAMORANO wrote:
Indigent criminal defendants do not have the means to have Robert Bennett as their lawyers nor Alan Dershowitz as a consultant. Also, inmates are not placed on house arrest simply because they are subjected to physical abuse. This man should return the money he took from unsuspecting investors and that he most likely have in a bank domiciled somewhere in the Caribbean Most important of all, the presumption of innocence shouldn’t be given to an inmate so obviously guilty of huge fraud, all the legal arguments of his high paid lawyers notwithstanding.

May 19, 2010 9:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ssejhill wrote:
It sounds that Stanford is playing the system. If he keeps changing lawyers he’ll never get a speedy trial, which would violate his Constitutional rights. Hopefully the judge will see right through his ploy. I hardly believe that he is indigent. He’s accused of running a $7 billion Ponzi scheme. He most likely has millions tucked away somewhere.

May 19, 2010 10:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
hadas wrote:
Even if he is guilty of the charges, no one deserves to be exposed to the savage animals that occupy the Texas jail where he is presently residing. As part of the legal process, Stanford should have been separated from the general population of that facility.

It is the responsibility of the legal system to protect individuals awaiting trial. Unfortunately, I believe some of the guards and wardens that operate these facilities take perverse pleasure in watching a “free show”.

May 19, 2010 10:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.