Milk, wheat-free diet may not help autism: U.S. study

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed May 19, 2010 3:11pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A popular diet that eliminates wheat and milk protein does not appear to help children with autism, but early behavioral treatments do, researchers reported on Wednesday.

The findings are sure to disappoint many parents who have been trying to manage autism, which affects as many as 1 in 100 U.S. children.

"It would have been wonderful for children with autism and their families if we found that the gluten-free, casein-free diet could really help, but this small study didn't show significant benefits," said Dr. Susan Hyman of the University of Rochester in New York, who led the study.

Gluten is the protein found in wheat, rye and other grains, while casein is a milk protein.

"The removal of gluten and casein from the diet of a controlled group of young children with autism, all of whom were screened for celiac disease ... did not demonstrate a change in sleep habits, bowel habits, activity or core symptoms of autism," Hyman said.

Autism includes a range of conditions, from the social awkwardness seen in Asperger's syndrome to profound and severe disabilities. There is no cure and little information about treatments that work.

Hyman's team studied the diet after seeing Internet reports from parents who believed they saw effects in their children. There is some evidence linking autism with some potential abnormality or activity in the intestines and theories suggest proteins absorbed in the bowels may affect autism symptoms.

They tested 14 children aged 2 to 5, making sure they did not eat gluten or casein.

INTENSE STUDY

After at least four weeks on the strict diet, the children were randomly given snacks containing either gluten, casein, both or placebo in randomized order. The snacks were disguised so neither the child nor the caregiver knew they contained a "hidden" ingredient.

Parents, teachers and a research assistant filled out standardized surveys about each child's behavior the day before they received the snack, two hours after and 24 hours later, and the parents kept a diary throughout the experiment about eating, sleep and bowel habits.

The children were videotaped to assess social interaction.

There were no differences after the challenge, the researchers told the International Meeting for Autism Research in Philadelphia.

Hyman said other diets may work. "We only eliminated food containing gluten and casein," she said.

While on the special diet, the children took part in early childhood education programs, and those seemed to help their symptoms, Hyman said.

"All got the same early education care," Hyman said. "Early childhood education appears to work in helping symptoms of autism."

She also said it is possible that children with lactose intolerance or celiac disease -- an allergy to wheat protein -- may be helped by the diet.

"This is really just the tip of the iceberg. There are many possible effects of diet, including over- and under-nutrition, on behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders that need to be scientifically investigated so families can make informed decisions about the therapies they choose for their children," Hyman said.

(Editing by Julie Steenhuysen and Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
MartinMM wrote:
The “conclusions” inferred by this “News” story are fabricated. People should not be deterred from improving their children’s diet by this anti-hope propaganda.

The description of this “study” states ONLY that children challenged with gluten or casein after 4 weeks didn’t show significant behavior change. How does THAT ever lead to the conclusion “does not appear to help?”

Sheer stupidity!

EVERY Human Being knows that Diet affects HEALTH, that DIET affects Human Behavior.

All Autism Diets involve a Diet Change from “random/haphazard” food choices to “strategic/calculated.” Doing this, for ANY physical condition, is the most scientifically sound health intervention.

Indeed, autism diets can be complex, though they are also simple. Improve diet quality through strategic omissions and additions to food CHOICES.

Using inane “studies” like this one, and “propaganda” headlines in order to deter people from following a HEALING PATH, should be akin to malpractice in healthcare – as the advice is antithetical to common sense and can be HARMFUL to children if parents HEED these stories and choose to NOT pay attention to FOOD INTAKE, when FOOD INTAKE is of the UTMOST importance to children.

This article is very irresponsible.

May 19, 2010 4:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
WKaraki wrote:
This article is not saying that no diet can help, and is not “anti-hope”.
It just makes that point that it appears that eliminating gluten and casein specifically does not seem have a significant effect on “autism”.

That doesn’t mean that they recommend against feeding all kids a healthy and wholesome diet, nor does it say that other diets and food choices can’t have a beneficial or detrimental effect on autism.

May 19, 2010 6:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mcbobbo wrote:
MartinMM, try and take a step back, and read the words actually written here.

“”This is really just the tip of the iceberg. There are many possible effects of diet, including over- and under-nutrition, on behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders that need to be scientifically investigated so families can make informed decisions about the therapies they choose for their children,” Hyman said.”

The fact is they’re not propagandizing anything here. They’re acknowledging that there may be a dietary approach. They are only pointing out that there isn’t any evidence that gluten/casein had any impact on the kids they examined.

It could be something else, but this isn’t it.

Your rant isn’t doing any us any favors. Please calm down a bit and re-read the article from a more rational point of view.

Thanks!

May 19, 2010 6:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.