Lawmakers ask FTC to look into Google Wi-Fi data

WASHINGTON Wed May 19, 2010 4:13pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two lawmakers who co-chair the House Privacy Caucus asked the Federal Trade Commission if Google broke the law in collecting WiFi and other Internet data while taking photographs for its Street View product.

Reps. Joe Barton, a Republican, and Edward Markey, a Democrat, wrote to the FTC chairman to ask if the agency was looking into the data collection, which Google has said was "a mistake."

Google said on May 14 that its fleet of cars responsible for photographing streets around the world have for several years collected personal information -- which a security expert said could include email messages and passwords -- sent by consumers over wireless networks.

Barton and Markey, in their letter dated May 19, which was made publicly released, asked the FTC how the data was collected and stored, and who had access to it. They also asked if the data collection violated a reasonable expectation of privacy and if the practice was deceptive or illegal.

The FTC and Justice Department are both interested in looking into the data collection, a source close to the agencies' conversations said.

The FTC confirmed receipt of the letter, but had no immediate comment. A spokeswoman for the Justice Department was not immediately available for comment.

Google said that it had segregated the data on its network and hoped to dispose of it quickly. The data collected in Ireland was deleted last weekend, Google said.

Google did not specify what kind of data the high-tech cars collected, but a security expert said that email content and passwords for many users, as well as general Web surfing activity, could easily have been caught in Google's dragnet.

(Reporting by Diane Bartz; editing by Carol Bishopric)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
mykldean wrote:
I don’t like the idea of any government having access to that data.
It is important to make sure that the data wasn’t used or acquired illegally and that that any remedies are applied. I imagine there is a way to have justice without anyone/any government ever nefariously using the information.

May 19, 2010 8:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Rukaribe wrote:
I think we should have people going around constantly collecting this data. Serves these idiots right for not protecting it. I hate privacy hawks, they are some of the most self centred, narcisstic people out there who just harm the greater good of society for their personal illogical interests. You do not have a right to privacy, you have a right to undue search and observation. So if you want to be private that means you have to hide in your house. You have to provide your own privacy, so don’t use Facebook, the internet, don’t go out of the house. Just live your pathetic stupid little life inside with your head like you want because clearly you cannot comprehend anything outside of it. /spit

May 20, 2010 1:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

A tourist takes a plunge as she swims at Ngapali Beach, a popular tourist site, in the Thandwe township of the Rakhine state, October 6, 2013. Picture taken October 6, 2013. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun (MYANMAR - Tags: SOCIETY) - RTR3FOI0

Where do you want to go?

We look at when to take trips, budget considerations and the popularity of multigenerational family travel.   Video