U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

U.S. will "push" out BP if spill response falls short

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar testifies at the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on “Federal Response to the Recent Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico” on Capitol Hill in Washington May 18, 2010. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar testifies at the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on “Federal Response to the Recent Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico” on Capitol Hill in Washington May 18, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

HOUSTON | Sun May 23, 2010 3:47pm EDT

HOUSTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government will move aside BP from the operation to try to halt the Gulf of Mexico oil spill if it decides the company is not performing as required in its response to the well leak, U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said on Sunday.

"I am angry and I am frustrated that BP has been unable to stop this oil from leaking and to stop the pollution from spreading," Salazar told reporters after visiting BP's U.S. headquarters in Houston.

"We are 33 days into this effort and deadline after deadline has been missed," Salazar added, referring to the failure of containment efforts attempted so far by London-based BP to control the gushing undersea well one mile down on the ocean floor.

President Barack Obama's administration is facing growing public and political pressure to take full charge of the oil spill containment operation as criticism against BP grows.

The spill is threatening an ecological and economic disaster along the U.S. Gulf Coast.

"If we find they're not doing what they're supposed to be doing, we'll push them out of the way appropriately," Salazar said, but he did not specify at what point this would occur or what might be the trigger for it.

"This is an existential crisis for one of the world's largest companies," he said, in a reference to the billions of dollars of cleanup and damages costs that BP faces.

Salazar also said BP had agreed to pay cleanup costs beyond the $75 million liability limit set by current U.S. law.

(Reporting by Chris Baltimore; Editing by Pascal Fletcher and Will Dunham)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
fubp wrote:
Once PB’s grouse negligence is brought out, they would never be allowed to drill that reservoir. So they keep it leaking to justify drilling “ relief wells” because that reservoir will pay for the clean up. They are not about to loose $10,000,000,000 dollars over the life of the reservoir and pay the clean up cost, unless the Government makes them. BP keeps taking wks between actions but they started drilling two wells right away. Bp should have a second pipe lowered and ready on stand by, they should have tried the hole shot wks ago and the mud fill wks ago. If the mud does not work then they will put a new Blow out preventer over the old one (let me guess they don’t have the new one sitting on the bottom next to the well to try 10 minutes after the mud fails) If BP would come out $10,000,000,000 ahead by stopping the leak in 10 days they would have don it, but the clean up cost would have been about the same with no money from the “relief wells”. IT’S ALWAYS ABOUT THE MONEY. Believe me BP DID THE MATH!

May 23, 2010 2:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
richinnc wrote:
I am angry that after the oil embargo of the 70’s the government did not not make energy independence a number one priority. They SHOULD have noticed that much of our oil is imported and thus we have no control over it. So shame on our “leaders” for the past 30-40 years for not doing something to make oil less needed. If they had used American research for an alternative where would we be today. Think of cell phones – just getting a start in the 70’s and look at cell phones today. Could we have done similar with energy??

May 23, 2010 3:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mckibbinusa wrote:
I have asked this question on Reuters now several times, and if anyone is reading my comments at BP or in the US Government, I would appreciate a response through the media — why not use demolitions to collapse and seal the well — thank you for the official response through the press…

May 23, 2010 3:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.