WaMu bank unit bondholders oppose bankruptcy plan

Customers leave a bank branch at the Washington Mutual headquarters in downtown Seattle, Washington September 26, 2008. REUTERS/Robert Sorbo

Customers leave a bank branch at the Washington Mutual headquarters in downtown Seattle, Washington September 26, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Sorbo

NEW YORK | Mon May 24, 2010 7:53pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A group of senior bondholders of Washington Mutual Inc's WAMUQ.PK banking unit on Monday said they oppose a global settlement reached Friday with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp over the thrift's September 2008 failure.

The proposed settlement calls for the return of $7 billion to creditors. It is also designed to resolve claims arising from the FDIC's role as receiver for Washington Mutual, and claims between the bankrupt holding company and JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), which bought the thrift's banking operations. The settlement requires court approval.

William Isaacson, a partner at the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP representing the banking unit's senior bondholders, in a statement called the proposed settlement "an enormous loss" to the bankruptcy estate, creating a "windfall" for the holding company and JPMorgan through the awarding of billions of dollars of tax refunds.

He also said it was unfair that noteholders of the holding company would be paid in full, while senior noteholders at the bank unit level would "not receive anything close" to full payment.

"Our clients do not support this proposed settlement," he said. "They will seek to vindicate their rights and claims, including their claims in the Washington Mutual Inc bankruptcy proceedings, until a decision on the merits is reached."

Washington Mutual is the largest U.S. banking company to fail. Regulators seized it on September 25, 2008 after it suffered a run on deposits, amid tens of billions of dollars of exposure subprime mortgages, adjustable-rate mortgages and home equity loans.

The case is In re: Washington Mutual Inc, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware, No. 08-12229.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel, editing by Bernard Orr)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
WithCatz wrote:
What happened to reporting the HUGE important line from the WMB bondholders PR announcement:

“It appears that the FDIC’s motivation for entering into this proposed settlement may, at least in some measure, have been to avoid further scrutiny of how it handled this matter. ”

The WMB Bondholder are now stating what the Equity Shareholders have been stating for quite some time.

The FDIC has wrongdoing.

May 24, 2010 9:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mottom wrote:
I totally agree with the above comment. The FDIC wants to cover something up that is why it is trying to settle quick. I hope the judge in this case does not approve of the this plan. All of america wants to know who brought down WaMu and we want to see justice.

May 25, 2010 1:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.