U.S. gene study reveals toll of heavy smoking

Related Topics

CHICAGO | Wed May 26, 2010 4:04pm EDT

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Heavy smokers who get lung cancer may have tens of thousands of genetic mutations, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday.

A team at Roche's biotechnology unit Genentech in California compared all the genetic changes in a single patient's lung tumor with healthy tissue from the patient, a 51-year-old man who had smoked an average of 25 cigarettes per day for 15 years before the tumor was removed.

What they found were as many as 50,000 genetic mutations.

"Fifty thousand is a huge number. No one has ever reported such a high number," said Zemin Zhang of Genentech, whose findings appear in the journal Nature.

"This is likely associated with the smoking history of the patient. It is very alarming," Zhang said in a telephone interview.

Smoking is the biggest single cause of lung cancer, and studies suggest mutations occur with each cigarette smoked.

Zhang said the ratio between the number of cigarettes the person smoked before his tumor was removed and the number of mutations in the tumor suggest that for every three cigarettes he smoked, one genetic mutation occurred.

"It's a lot more complicated than that," Zhang said, noting that there are DNA repair mechanisms in the body that help protect against the damage of smoking, but these become less efficient over time.

Zhang said the team was so surprised by the findings they made extra checks to see if they got it wrong. They also looked for anything unusual about the smoker whose tumor they studied. "There is nothing unusual about this sample," he said.

The findings may be sobering for those contemplating taking up smoking. "If you imagine over a lifetime you are going to develop this many mutations in the genome, some people may think twice about it," he said.

ADVANCES IN GENE SEQUENCING

The study was made possible by advances in gene sequencing technology that allows researchers to look at entire genomes, rather than searching for a handful of genes that appear to be especially important in certain cancers.

This new way of studying cancer is painting a much more complex picture of the disease.

For example, the team discovered areas of the genome needed to make proteins -- which are important for cell survival -- had far lower rates of mutations, suggesting these areas are better protected, Zhang said.

But he noted the findings only reflect one man's genome. "Obviously, we'd love to have multiple fully sequenced genomes in multiple tumors," he said.

However, it already offers a much broader view of the genetic changes in lung cancer.

The price of sequencing an entire genome is falling rapidly. The latest machines from companies like Illumina and Life Technologies Corp can map out a patient's entire DNA code for as little as $5,000 [ID:nN26244408].

Many companies are developing machines that can do the job for $1,000.

Zhang said his team worked with a private company called Complete Genomics in Mountain View, California. "I think this provides a preview of what whole genome sequencing can tell us about the cancer genome," he said.

(Editing by Maggie Fox)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
nostraden wrote:
And all the DISEASE and DEATHS CAUSED BY ALCOHOL ?
Liver,Brain,Throat,Spleen,Kidney,Pancreas,Prostate,Bladder,Heart,Arteries,And all the PEOPLE IT KILLS Nationwide ?
This is CONDONED RIGHT ? YES

May 27, 2010 11:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Vellocatus wrote:
“Heavy smokers who get lung cancer may have tens of thousands of genetic mutations,”

NOW that has been determined in ONE smoker – how many mutations are there in a NON SMOKERS lung cancer? Are there more or less? Are mutations only relevant to smokers – don’t they occur in never smokers and if so, what causes their lung cancer, what causes their mutations?

“This is likely associated with…” – “studies suggest”

Do any current scientists ever bother with EVIDENCE or do assumptions and personal subjective interpretations suffice today?

What PROOF is there of an ‘association’- in ONE smoker? What is the basis of a ’suggestion’? Genetics is a worthwhile science BUT it must be kept in perspective .

“Smoking is the biggest single cause of lung cancer,” – this is based on STATISTICS – NOT hard science! A simple established principle applies – correlation is NOT proof of causation. Scientists have been aware of this since Doll produced the first UK study linking smoking with cancer – That was 60 years ago – and we are STILL repeating his work. Still parroting his conclusions based on statistics.

Smoking has been reducing in the developed world ever since then too, YET cancers continue to increase year on year! In USA new cases of Lung cancer increased by almost a third in eight years between 2000 and 2008. If Dolls claims were correct then some benefit MUST be observable by now – but that is NOT the case. THIS ‘SUGGESTS’ that something other than smoking is the cause.

Here’s a suggestion – concentrate on the study of cancers in NEVER SMOKERS, thereby eliminating smoking as a confounding factor and maybe, just maybe, we may discover what really causes cancer and then maybe, just maybe, we may find a cure!

It won’t happen will it? – Why; because there is too much easy money to be made in the field of anti-smoking research. (Just you try to get funding for that research and see how far you get!!) Many more non-smokers will have to die before common sense returns to medical science. While the con remains that only smokers suffer ill health then it is unlikely that any cure for many cancers will be found. It seems that anti-smoker fanaticism overrides any concern about their own and other non-smokers health?
Is the gravy train THAT good?

May 27, 2010 5:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.