Special Report

Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) workers contracted by BP clean up oil on the beach in Port Fourchon, Louisiana May 23, 2010. REUTERS/Patrick Kelley/U.S. Coast Guard photo/Handout

Civil fine in oil spill could be $4,300 barrel

How many barrels of oil are gushing into the Gulf of Mexico? The answer could have implications that go well beyond just the environment.   Full Article 

BP had warning signs before Gulf blast: panel

Related Video

Video

Oil rig victims honoured

Wed, May 26 2010

1 of 7.

Credit: Reuters

WASHINGTON | Wed May 26, 2010 12:13pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - BP Plc told congressional investigators on Tuesday that pressure tests on a drill pipe showed a fundamental mistake hours before the deadly explosion that caused the Gulf of Mexico oil leak, a memo released by two congressmen showed.

The memo by Representatives Henry Waxman and Bart Stupak, who were briefed by BP about the progress of its internal investigation, also said problems were found in equipment meant to provide fail-safe protection against a blow out.

A BP investigator indicated to the lawmakers that the fundamental mistake may have been made because heavy pressure on the drill line of 1,400 pounds per square inch (98 kg per square cm) was an "indicator of a very large abnormality."

The memo did not indicate who made decisions after the problem was found. BP and Transocean, the owner and operator of the rig, had supervisors on the rig when it exploded.

About two hours before the explosion that killed 11 workers and caused the leak that is still gushing oil, the rig team was satisfied a test on another line was successful, the BP investigator said.

BP would not comment on the memo.

A Transocean spokesman blamed BP for the disaster, saying, "A well is constructed and completed the same way a house is built -- at the direction of the owner and the architect. And in this case, that's BP."

The congressional memo said BP data showed there were numerous problems with production equipment. Nearly five hours before the explosion, an unexpected loss of fluid was observed in the well's riser pipe. That suggests "there were leaks in the annual preventer," a rubber gasket in the blowout preventer, the memo said.

Waxman and Stupak chair the House Energy and Commerce Committee's investigative subcommittee, which has reviewed over 105,000 pages of internal documents from BP, rig owner Transocean Ltd, Halliburton Co, and blowout preventer manufacturer Cameron.

The memo said the BP investigation has also raised concerns about the maintenance history, modification, and inspection of the blowout preventer.

Officials from BP and Transocean are scheduled to testify before congressional panels on Thursday.

According to BP, there also were three warning signs of problems with unwanted flow in the well starting 51 minutes before the explosion. About 18 minutes before the explosion abnormal pressure leaks of the fluids known as mud meant to keep oil and gas capped were observed and the pump was shut down.

"The data suggests that the crew may have attempted mechanical interventions at that point to control the pressure, but soon after, the flow out and pressure increased dramatically and the explosion took place," the memo said.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner, editing by Philip Barbara and Bill Trott)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
“three warming signs” above should be ” three warning signs”

May 25, 2010 11:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
DBCooper wrote:
“1,400 pounds per square inch” doesn’t sound abnormal. It was 13,000 at the bottom of the well.

Again, where was it measured? What’s a “drill line?” Sounds like a cable tool. Nothing called that in http://oilgasglossary.com

May 25, 2010 11:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
wowkoreaengi wrote:
what the PB? is it company?

May 25, 2010 12:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.