The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Bernanke makes case for Fed independence

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gives a speech at a conference hosted by the Bank of Japan in Tokyo May 26, 2010. REUTERS/Yuriko Nakao

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gives a speech at a conference hosted by the Bank of Japan in Tokyo May 26, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Yuriko Nakao

TOKYO | Wed May 26, 2010 3:42am EDT

TOKYO (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke stepped up calls to preserve Fed independence on Wednesday, saying central banks best deliver steady economic growth and low inflation when free from political meddling.

Bernanke's comments address the U.S. central bank's overarching worry about the sweeping overhaul of financial rules making steady progress through the U.S. Congress: a provision subjecting the Fed's monetary policy decisions to congressional audits.

"Political interference in monetary policy can generate undesirable boom-bust cycles that ultimately lead to both a less stable economy and higher inflation," Bernanke said in remarks prepared for delivery to a conference at the Bank of Japan.

The audit provision, authored by political outlier and long-time Fed abolition advocate Representative Ron Paul, gained surprise inclusion in proposed House of Representatives legislation late last year.

Hunger for greater Fed accountability stemmed from lingering resentment at big bank bailouts during the financial crisis and discomfort at the Fed's autonomy in launching financial rescues worth tens of billions of dollars.

The Fed lobbied hard against the provision and beat back the inclusion of similar language from regulatory reform legislation recently approved in the Senate.

However, the two legislative bodies must now meld separate bills before the financial rules rewrite can be signed into law.

The Fed chairman did not discuss the outlook for the U.S. economy or interest rates, but argued that central banks must be able to act based on what is best for the economy in the long run, even if its actions pinch in the short-term.

Bernanke said central banks subject to political influence may face pressures to delay raising borrowing costs when inflation begins to surface to achieve short-term gains in employment and growth.

In addition, a government that controls a central bank may be tempted to push the institution to print money to finance a budget deficit, Bernanke said.

Central bank independence is important not just in connection with setting interest rates to spur or slow economic growth, he said, but also in deploying a recent addition to the policy-making tool kit, that of flooding the financial system with money to stimulate growth, referred to as "quantitative

easing."

"The costs of undue government influence on the central bank's quantitative easing decisions could be especially large, since such an influence might be tantamount to giving the government the ability to demand the monetization of its debt," he said.

The Fed chairman tacitly acknowledged concerns that the U.S. central bank had overstepped its responsibilities during the crisis or that it operates under a shroud of secrecy.

He said the Fed supports efforts to clarify the dividing line between monetary and fiscal responsibilities. In that connection, the Fed backs a mechanism to shut down failing financial firms, he said.

"The case for independent lender-of-last resort function is strongest when the associated fiscal risks are minimal," he said.

The central bank has a responsibility to be transparent and accountable, and the Fed has in recent years stepped up efforts to make public its deliberations and activities, he said.

(Editing by Tomasz Janowski)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
need4change wrote:
Thankfully the Internet is bringing society closer to our supposed “representatives”. They can no longer operate in the shadows far away from the citizens in Washington. Social and government changes are in the air and voters are noticing.

November will be interesting to see what the citizens think of the irresponsible fiscal nature of Washington while the rest of the country is tightening their fiscal spending. Washington is no longer in the shadows and their actions are becoming public. They will be held accountable.

Now if only we could eradicate the 2 party system which is dividing the policies in strange ways. Policies should not be chosen because of the other party doing one thing.

May 26, 2010 4:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ezineeros wrote:
The refusal of King George III to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators was probably the prime cause of the revolution.
Benjamin Franklin- Founding Father 1706-1790

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of their property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
President Thomas Jefferson 1743-1826

The bold efforts the present bank has made to control the government are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into perpetuation of this institution, or the establishment of another like it.
President Andrew Jackson- 1767-1845

I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by it’s system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.
President Woodrow Wilson 1919

The real truth of the matter is that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government since the days of andrew Jackson.
President Franklin D Roosevelt 1933

A world banking system was being set up here. A super state controlled by international bankers, acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. The Fed has usurped the government.
Congressmen- Louis McFadden

If there were no debt in our money system, there wouldn’t be any money.
Marriner Eccles- Chairman of the Federal Reserve

The Morgan interests took advantage to precipitate the panic of 1907, guiding it shrewdly as it progressed.
Fredrik Allen- Life Magazine

May 26, 2010 5:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
need4change wrote:
Interesting statements @above.

I suspect that the government controlling the printing of money would probably be equally disastrous, if not more so, then the private entity known as the Federal Reserve controlling it.

The elections tend to go in cycles, with each party gaining traction as the others support dwindles. Giving congress control of printing money would simply mean the Democrats would print their share, then the Republicans. Meanwhile the citizens would suffer from the caused inflation.

We the people need more representation in Washington. Enough of this harmful 2 party pendulum allowing the worst of the 2 parties to go through every second election swing. (Not necessarily every election, but every time the vote shifts)

May 26, 2010 5:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.