U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Russia says Iran was deaf to its nuclear proposals

Related Topics

MOSCOW | Thu May 27, 2010 3:14pm EDT

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia rejected on Thursday Iran's criticism of it for supporting draft sanctions against Tehran, saying Iran repeatedly had ignored Moscow's efforts to resolve the crisis over the Iranian nuclear programme.

In one of the worst rows between the two countries in decades, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday admonished the Kremlin for bowing to what he said was U.S. pressure to agree to sanctions.

Ahmadinejad bluntly warned President Dmitry Medvedev to be more cautious or risk being seen as an enemy of the Islamic Republic. The Kremlin told the Iranian president to refrain from "political demagoguery."

When asked by a reporter about Ahmadinejad's tirade, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said he viewed the comments as "emotional."

Underscoring Moscow's growing impatience with Iran, Lavrov said that Russian leaders had tried repeatedly to resolve the dispute but that Tehran had failed to respond properly.

"To our great regret, during years -- not just months -- Iran's response to these efforts has been unsatisfactory, mildly speaking," Lavrov said at a briefing in Moscow.

Lavrov also said that a nuclear fuel swap deal agreed between Iran, Turkey and Brazil would be an important breakthrough if implemented.

"We hail this step," he said. "Indeed, if it is fully implemented, it will... really create very important preconditions for improving the atmosphere for resuming talks."

Later on Thursday Lavrov phoned Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki to discuss the sanctions resolution and the nuclear fuel-swap deal, the foreign ministry said in a statement.

"The Russian side pledged active cooperation in pushing forward the negotiation process... with a focus on the need to find a mutually acceptable solution in the political-diplomatic arena as soon as possible," the statement said.

(Reporting by Dmitry Solovyov and Conor Humphries, editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Michael Roddy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
maxfabella wrote:
Iran is tempting fate, by not following
the united nations.

May 27, 2010 3:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
rightofreturn wrote:
It is not following the united nations but security council. Security council does not represent the World. The power in the council is wielded by 5 winners in World War II. The rest of the members are elected periodically and do not enjoy veto power. Security council has no right to change the rules of NPT that allows Iran to enrich uranium. These rules were agreed upon by all members of NPT which includes the said five powers. If Iran has not been completely transparent in its nuclear activities with IAEA it is because if Israel (or US) knows whereabouts of its facilities, they will probably bomb them. Iran does not want to share the fate of Iraq and Syria. And if these nations bomb Iran, since US has veto power, security counil cannot even condemn it. Rule of law applies only to the weak, sir, unfortunately.

May 27, 2010 4:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dz3 wrote:
How about we get some facts straight. First off, two of the original Security Council govt’s have been replaced since the conclusion of the Second World War, so it really is not made up of the “5 winners in WW II”. Second, while Israel did pull off a bombing decades ago against Iraq’s nuclear facilities (and more recently, Syria’s), it is widely held in the world military community that logistics (fly over permission, the depth at which the Iranian facilities are almost gauranteed to be at, etc.) preclude such an action againt the Iranians.

This is not about the strong and the weak; it is about a government which refuses to acknowledge international norms of condust. The tell tale sign is precisely the dust up going on as we speak between Iran and Russia, one of her (heretofore) staunchest supporters.

May 27, 2010 6:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.