U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Democrats try scaled down tax bill

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed May 26, 2010 10:20pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congressional Democrats cut the cost of a package of spending and tax hikes by nearly a third on Wednesday and delayed action for one more day as they raced to ensure passage before safety-net programs expire next week.

With some centrist lawmakers balking at the cost of the original package, House Democratic leaders scaled back unemployment benefits and doctor payments, according to a summary released late Wednesday.

The latest version of the legislation would add about $90 billion to the deficit over 10 years, down from $134 billion in the original legislation, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

"We're determined to get this bill passed by the end of the week," said Chris Van Hollen, a member of the House Democratic leadership.

House Democrats had hoped to pass the bill earlier in the week to give the Senate more time to consider the measure, but extended negotiations pushed a House vote back to Thursday at the earliest.

"My expectation is we'll put that on the floor in the very near future," said House Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer.

The revised bill would postpone pending cuts to doctors in the Medicare program for 1-1/2 years, down from 3-1/2 years in the original bill.

That would push the bill's total cost down to a level less likely to alarm centrist lawmakers like Democratic Senator Kent Conrad who are reluctant to add to a budget deficit expected to approach last year's record $1.4 trillion figure.

MEDICARE PAYMENT SYSTEM FLAW

A flaw in Medicare's payment system pays doctors at outdated rates, which would amount to a 21 percent pay cut unless Congress patches it with a periodic payment update.

"If that is all we can get right now, we'll take it," said John Crosby, executive director of the American Osteopathic Association.

If the legislation stalls, unemployment aid and health benefits will run out for hundreds of thousands of Americans starting next week. Although the economy started climbing out of recession in mid-2009, unemployment has remained near 10 percent and is projected to stay stubbornly high.

The original bill planned to extend the programs through the end of the year. The latest proposal would see them expire at the end of November.

One of the most controversial aspects of the bill would increase taxes on fund managers in private equity and other firms to at least 35 percent from the current 15 percent. The legislation also tightens tax rules for multinational companies and oil companies in particular.

Financial interests are lobbying heavily to kill that part of the bill, which would raise about $20 billion over a decade.

A Democratic aide said provisions other than the Medicare issue were unlikely to change before the bill reaches the House floor. Labor unions, some governors, doctors and senior groups are pressing for its passage.

Republicans oppose the bill, citing its deficit impact. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said the cost wiped out savings estimated from the healthcare overhaul that passed earlier this year.

"This is fiscal recklessness," McConnell said. "And that's why even some Democrats are starting to revolt."

The revised bill's $127 billion in new spending would be offset by $43 billion in new taxes, according to CBO.

LOBBYISTS FAN OUT

Lobbyists on both sides fanned out across the Capitol on Wednesday and warned that jobs would be at stake if the legislation went through -- or did not.

Pennsylvania Democratic Governor Ed Rendell said Republicans were winning the rhetorical war over the deficit. He said his state would have to lay off 25,000 workers if $24 billion in federal health payments to states was not renewed and that 30 other governors also depended on that money.

"Do people want to see fireman and policemen and EMTs (emergency workers) and teachers laid off? Of course not," Rendell said.

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid has threatened to keep the chamber in session through the weekend to get the bill passed before June, when unemployment benefits and other safety net provisions expire.

Reid said on Wednesday there would be enough votes to get the bill through the Senate once it passes the House.

Most business groups, from the Chamber of Commerce to investment fund managers, are lobbying against the bill.

"This goes to the heart of how partnerships have been taxed for decades and to whether there is any sweat equity people put into business," Jeff DeBoer, executive director of the Real Estate Roundtable.

One exception is the National Retail Federation, which is pushing for renewal of a tax provision that shortens the period companies can take deductions for fixing up stores.

"It sounds like an arcane tax issue but it's really an important jobs issue," spokesman Craig Shearman said. (Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Peter Cooney and Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Pilot wrote:
“This is fiscal recklessness!”
Don’t spend money we don’t have! Pure deficit $ is what this is! Shame on Congress! We are over 13 Trillion in debt right now! This spending is absurd. Defeat the bill!

May 26, 2010 10:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
netdoc44 wrote:
It sure doesn’t look like “fiscal recklessness” to those of us who have been frantically trying to find jobs (14 months now for me). Absurd? What’s absurd is all the taxes I’ve paid over forty years with only two times where unemployment was needed and then to be told: “Sorry, we can’t afford to help you even though you’ve paid into the system for four decades.” That’s absurd when we can afford to throw billion$ and billion$ to replace the GAMBLING losses of all the sorry rats on Wall Street who brought this on us.

Defeat the bill, indeed. Shame on you and all your McConnell type heroes. You are either fools (for throwing the money at Wall Street under Bush) or criminals who take the lobbyist’s money to take care of the millionaires and crush the middle class.

As was said to Sen. Joseph McCarthy (do you know enough history to identify him and the ruin he brought on many people?) “Have you no shame? At long last, have you no shame at all?”

May 26, 2010 11:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
stevesmithjr wrote:
Fall of 2006, unemployment was at 4.4%, and our economy was in decent shape. Then the Democrats took over Congress. And thanks to them overregulating our free market, unemployment has been on the rise and we’ve been in a recession.

FACTS.

You Democrats have two choices here. You can continue to live in denial and blame this and everything else that’s gone/going wrong on Bush, or you can face reality and understand that Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have no idea what the hell they are doing, and are making things worse.

Do things honestly look like they’re getting any better under their rule? Has spending God only knows how many trillions of dollars in the last year and half helped anything or anyone? Do you honestly think it’s going to get any better by spending even more money?

The ONLY way out of this mess is to dramatically cut spending on all this “Marxist, Socialist, Communist nonsense” and make major tax cuts for everyone.

Somehow I don’t see this regime doing any of this anytime soon. And guess who gets to pay for it…

May 27, 2010 7:10am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.